One Major aspect of the appeal but I'm running follows based on what you will see below.
Justice Mellor, in his findings, took it upon himself to determine the personality of Satoshi Nakamoto based not on concrete evidence, but rather on his own interpretation of how he believed Satoshi would act.
This raises serious concerns, as such determinations, made without reference to the actual facts, can lead to dangerous precedents.
In his judgement, Justice Mellor refused to engage with the primary sources—he did not read any of the writings of Satoshi, did not examine the original postings of Satoshi, nor did he analyse the original version of Bitcoin. Instead, he chose to craft a fictional personality based on his perceptions promoted by BTC Core from after 2017 rather than the available evidence.
This is akin to intellectual negligence.
How can one form a judgement on an individual without considering the direct words and works of that person?
To determine the intentions and personality of Satoshi Nakamoto without reviewing the foundational documents of Bitcoin—the very framework that this entire debate revolves around—is not only reckless but betrays a fundamental lack of commitment to the truth.
This is the very nature of modern intellectualism, where opinion often overshadows evidence and emotion supplants logic.
One must ask, what kind of justice is this?
To ignore the very words of the person in question, the person whose vision has shaped the Bitcoin system, is to disregard the foundation of truth.
In failing to examine Satoshi’s writings and refusing to consider the technical integrity of Bitcoin, the court has chosen to construct a narrative, one based on assumptions rather than substance.
This is not justice; this is ideology parading as analysis.
These points are all in my appeal document. This document will eventually be public no matter what the outcome is.
• • •
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Oct 20, 2024
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1847856216325730320.html
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1571
Justice Mellor, in his findings, took it upon himself to determine the personality of Satoshi Nakamoto based not on concrete evidence, but rather on his own interpretation of how he believed Satoshi would act.
This raises serious concerns, as such determinations, made without reference to the actual facts, can lead to dangerous precedents.
In his judgement, Justice Mellor refused to engage with the primary sources—he did not read any of the writings of Satoshi, did not examine the original postings of Satoshi, nor did he analyse the original version of Bitcoin. Instead, he chose to craft a fictional personality based on his perceptions promoted by BTC Core from after 2017 rather than the available evidence.
This is akin to intellectual negligence.
How can one form a judgement on an individual without considering the direct words and works of that person?
To determine the intentions and personality of Satoshi Nakamoto without reviewing the foundational documents of Bitcoin—the very framework that this entire debate revolves around—is not only reckless but betrays a fundamental lack of commitment to the truth.
This is the very nature of modern intellectualism, where opinion often overshadows evidence and emotion supplants logic.
One must ask, what kind of justice is this?
To ignore the very words of the person in question, the person whose vision has shaped the Bitcoin system, is to disregard the foundation of truth.
In failing to examine Satoshi’s writings and refusing to consider the technical integrity of Bitcoin, the court has chosen to construct a narrative, one based on assumptions rather than substance.
This is not justice; this is ideology parading as analysis.
These points are all in my appeal document. This document will eventually be public no matter what the outcome is.
• • •
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Oct 20, 2024
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1847856216325730320.html
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1571
Comments
Be the first to add a comment
Log in to comment