Public commentary on legal matters is not an act of intimidation; it is the articulation of principles. To suggest that sharing an analysis of the legal framework in which I operate is coercive or threatening is a fundamental misrepresentation of reality.
The truth is clear: when I speak of the laws governing my champagne passing-off claim, I do so to protect the integrity of Bitcoin’s original design. This is not about ownership or identity; it is about safeguarding the public from deception.
@Copa and @btccore want to silence and sense of people who point out the changes they've been making.
R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales underscores the essence of free expression. It affirms that speech, when aimed at informing and analyzing, must not be suppressed by those who would twist it into an instrument of threat. To demand silence from those who seek to clarify the law is to undermine the very foundation of justice.
My public statements are neither threats nor veiled intentions; they are the plain exercise of intellectual rigor in a space where obfuscation reigns.
To attempt to silence legitimate public discourse is not mere censorship—it is the active promotion of misrepresentation. By seeking to suppress my statements, those aligned with @copa and @btccore are not merely trying to limit my voice; they are attempting to obscure the truth about Bitcoin and its original design.
Their aim is not to clarify but to distort, manipulating the narrative to fit their own agenda, all while undermining the core principles upon which Bitcoin was built.
This is not about protecting the public interest. It is about protecting their own interests—by warping the facts and silencing opposition.
By abusing the court’s process, they seek to drain time and resources, not in pursuit of justice, but in the hope of creating a chilling effect on those who would expose their misrepresentations. This is the misuse of legal mechanisms, not as a tool for equity, but as a weapon to entrench their misstatements in the public mind.
@copa and @btccore, through this abuse of the court’s time, are engaged in a campaign to reinforce their misleading narrative. They twist the legal system into a tool for their own deception, knowing full well that the claims they bring have no merit.
Their contempt for the truth is matched only by their willingness to weaponize the very process meant to protect it.
• • •
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Oct 24, 2024
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1849334223070806192.html
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1655
The truth is clear: when I speak of the laws governing my champagne passing-off claim, I do so to protect the integrity of Bitcoin’s original design. This is not about ownership or identity; it is about safeguarding the public from deception.
@Copa and @btccore want to silence and sense of people who point out the changes they've been making.
R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales underscores the essence of free expression. It affirms that speech, when aimed at informing and analyzing, must not be suppressed by those who would twist it into an instrument of threat. To demand silence from those who seek to clarify the law is to undermine the very foundation of justice.
My public statements are neither threats nor veiled intentions; they are the plain exercise of intellectual rigor in a space where obfuscation reigns.
To attempt to silence legitimate public discourse is not mere censorship—it is the active promotion of misrepresentation. By seeking to suppress my statements, those aligned with @copa and @btccore are not merely trying to limit my voice; they are attempting to obscure the truth about Bitcoin and its original design.
Their aim is not to clarify but to distort, manipulating the narrative to fit their own agenda, all while undermining the core principles upon which Bitcoin was built.
This is not about protecting the public interest. It is about protecting their own interests—by warping the facts and silencing opposition.
By abusing the court’s process, they seek to drain time and resources, not in pursuit of justice, but in the hope of creating a chilling effect on those who would expose their misrepresentations. This is the misuse of legal mechanisms, not as a tool for equity, but as a weapon to entrench their misstatements in the public mind.
@copa and @btccore, through this abuse of the court’s time, are engaged in a campaign to reinforce their misleading narrative. They twist the legal system into a tool for their own deception, knowing full well that the claims they bring have no merit.
Their contempt for the truth is matched only by their willingness to weaponize the very process meant to protect it.
• • •
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Oct 24, 2024
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1849334223070806192.html
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1655
Comments
Be the first to add a comment
Log in to comment