Agreed. Hormonal changes are rampant at that time in a child's development, but that is part of normal development, the conclusion of puberty is like cement going of, it becomes a solid fixed state for 99% of children.
This is why activists are pushing blockers, they don't want a world in which 99% of children reach maturity naturally, with nature dictating how they feel, and who they are.
Parents who choose to interfere at such a critical time in a child's development, and awakening, deserve to be condemned for such actions, as do those who have pushed, allowed this to happen.
There is no going back from this, better to deal with the fallout of a few displaced personalities, than actively create many more because parents are too weak to be parents, and do what is best, not what is 'popular'.
the worst offenders are those who do it for clout, or other self serving reasons.. There is no punishment to harsh for those types!
Most family court rulings, at least here in B.C. like to quote "in the best interests of the child" whenever they screw over the male parent, which is like 97% of the cases...... so explain how this pos of a judge made this decision while citing in the best interests of the child, when it clearly is not and since it is not would it then not be appealable since the judge clearly made an error in law, which is automatic aappeal.....
I think if they also included a ruling alongside it which said that the kids can later sue their parents as well as the institution if that consenting decision turns out to be a bad one, parents and the institutions would think twice before consenting.
Parents who do this love only themselves. It’s not about what’s best for the kid, it’s about having a trophy trans kid to show off your wokeness. Entirely selfish motives.
It is a choice between bad and worse: 1) recognize the power to allow this to the parents 2) recognize the power to allow this to the government 3) recognize the power of a minor to get it done to him/her-self
I would suggest all three MUST agree and no one must disagree. And the agreement MUST be fully voluntary and informed.
If everyone wrongly agree, there is no salvation anyway, for the child.
What MUST NOT be allowed is total and absolute government control over the minor against the parent will. Or the ability of the government to punish who disagree with it.
And, given the times we lives, over any individual.
Italy is trying to impose "vaccinations" for COVID to polices and health workers under penalty of losing the ability to work. If they get that, how could these oppose the government when it impose the same or worse to the rest of the population?
This is why activists are pushing blockers, they don't want a world in which 99% of children reach maturity naturally, with nature dictating how they feel, and who they are.
Parents who choose to interfere at such a critical time in a child's development, and awakening, deserve to be condemned for such actions, as do those who have pushed, allowed this to happen.
There is no going back from this, better to deal with the fallout of a few displaced personalities, than actively create many more because parents are too weak to be parents, and do what is best, not what is 'popular'.
the worst offenders are those who do it for clout, or other self serving reasons.. There is no punishment to harsh for those types!
1) recognize the power to allow this to the parents
2) recognize the power to allow this to the government
3) recognize the power of a minor to get it done to him/her-self
I would suggest all three MUST agree and no one must disagree. And the agreement MUST be fully voluntary and informed.
If everyone wrongly agree, there is no salvation anyway, for the child.
What MUST NOT be allowed is total and absolute government control over the minor against the parent will. Or the ability of the government to punish who disagree with it.
And, given the times we lives, over any individual.
Italy is trying to impose "vaccinations" for COVID to polices and health workers under penalty of losing the ability to work.
If they get that, how could these oppose the government when it impose the same or worse to the rest of the population?