The argument presents a flawed understanding of truth by implying that truth can be subject to the impact it has on people, whether it helps, hinders, or hurts them.
This view undermines the fundamental nature of truth as something absolute and unchanging.
Truth, by its very definition, is inviolable. It exists beyond the realm of human emotions, perceptions, or consequences.
The moment we begin to evaluate truth based on how it affects people, we risk distorting it to fit narratives or agendas.
Truth does not bend to convenience or comfort. It stands independently of whether it hurts or helps, because truth itself is the foundation upon which everything else is built.
Without truth, there can be no justice, no meaningful discourse, and no progress.
To argue otherwise is to open the door to manipulation, where what is deemed "truth" is shaped not by fact but by subjective impact.
The statement fails because it entertains the idea that truth's value could be diminished or questioned based on its consequences. In reality, truth’s importance is unwavering, and any attempt to weigh it against its impact on individuals or systems reflects a misunderstanding of its fundamental role in upholding order, integrity, and fairness.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Oct 18, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1847196949726089411?t=_xpDuY5u_vmSffyHPDLdnQ&s=09https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1615