2/2
BTC is a copy of bitcoin that is passing off. Arguably, it is not the mined bitcoin that should be of concern. Rather it is the bitcoin that have not been distributed. As a system that is passing off, the unilateral contract does not lead to a scenario that locks in that value.
It was not a technical reason why I could not change bitcoin, this is where all of the cyberpunk idiots go wrong. The issue about bitcoin being set in stone requires much deeper thought than just being able to change code. The passing off activity and demonstration of code changes enacted by core has been useful. The copying of the database has created a scenario where it is demonstrably easy to show that a basic protocol change is more than feasible when were talking about government intervention. As I've noted multiple times, there are 32 nodes on BTC right now and only 3 to 4 of those that matter at any stage. The issuance of a court order would be simple and require activity from those invested in the system.
Ask Google or Microsoft. It doesn't even matter if you're talking about distributed code, when you have a code repository you have a location to issue changes against.
And oh, the criminals who call me criminal are very simple to judge, they want to maintain Egold and Liberty reserve electronic currency and have a system that will enable their pump and dump schemes, money-laundering and other criminal activity.
So, the simple reason you never hear about Integyrs, Information Defence, GreyFog or any of the other Australian entities is that there are clear uncontested records. It doesn't take hearsay. It doesn't change anything by attacking my email or folders. No matter how much you try and alter external records, the government records remain. In fact, many of these are off-line and some are paper. It is rather difficult for Greg and his cohorts to attack and alter paper remotely.
https://web.archive.org/web/20091213093902/http://www.integyrs.com/
Oh the Easter eggs people still have not figured out.
But you see, if I was to react as I did originally to every attack, I would not get any work done. I would not have time for study, I would not have time to come up with white papers and I certainly would not have any time to engage in the things are important.
when you don't link all of the information, a page can seem blank when in fact it's not
What you are missing is that there is no way to win by playing their game.
They have no interest in the system that I've created. It's not like Egold or Liberty reserve. Rather they want a system that allows them to get away with anarchy and crime, and unfortunately for them this is not what bitcoin happens to be. When Greg said bitcoin didn't work, it was more that it didn't work in the way that he wanted a digital currency or electronic cash system to exist.
CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2365
BTC is a copy of bitcoin that is passing off. Arguably, it is not the mined bitcoin that should be of concern. Rather it is the bitcoin that have not been distributed. As a system that is passing off, the unilateral contract does not lead to a scenario that locks in that value.
It was not a technical reason why I could not change bitcoin, this is where all of the cyberpunk idiots go wrong. The issue about bitcoin being set in stone requires much deeper thought than just being able to change code. The passing off activity and demonstration of code changes enacted by core has been useful. The copying of the database has created a scenario where it is demonstrably easy to show that a basic protocol change is more than feasible when were talking about government intervention. As I've noted multiple times, there are 32 nodes on BTC right now and only 3 to 4 of those that matter at any stage. The issuance of a court order would be simple and require activity from those invested in the system.
Ask Google or Microsoft. It doesn't even matter if you're talking about distributed code, when you have a code repository you have a location to issue changes against.
And oh, the criminals who call me criminal are very simple to judge, they want to maintain Egold and Liberty reserve electronic currency and have a system that will enable their pump and dump schemes, money-laundering and other criminal activity.
So, the simple reason you never hear about Integyrs, Information Defence, GreyFog or any of the other Australian entities is that there are clear uncontested records. It doesn't take hearsay. It doesn't change anything by attacking my email or folders. No matter how much you try and alter external records, the government records remain. In fact, many of these are off-line and some are paper. It is rather difficult for Greg and his cohorts to attack and alter paper remotely.
https://web.archive.org/web/20091213093902/http://www.integyrs.com/
Oh the Easter eggs people still have not figured out.
But you see, if I was to react as I did originally to every attack, I would not get any work done. I would not have time for study, I would not have time to come up with white papers and I certainly would not have any time to engage in the things are important.
when you don't link all of the information, a page can seem blank when in fact it's not
What you are missing is that there is no way to win by playing their game.
They have no interest in the system that I've created. It's not like Egold or Liberty reserve. Rather they want a system that allows them to get away with anarchy and crime, and unfortunately for them this is not what bitcoin happens to be. When Greg said bitcoin didn't work, it was more that it didn't work in the way that he wanted a digital currency or electronic cash system to exist.
CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2365
Comments
Be the first to add a comment
Log in to comment