‘Notices and How To Use Them’

It is important to use notices accurately. A notice 'gives notice' of an occurrence or condition, which is subsequently documented as proof (when sent by recorded delivery, then verified on 'track and trace' to assure arrival, and the delivery information is then documented).

A Notice received in law is presumed acknowledged, and if not responded to, it is deemed consented to by ‘tacit agreement’.

Maintaining the integrity of your notifications and affidavits is crucial.

There is a general rule that you must offer sufficient notice of your intent within your notices, i.e. provide, say, 28 days to respond, or 30 days for any financial claims where it is reasonable to do so, and just 7 days if time is short (for example, a pending summons).

Then, if your notification is dismissed or greeted with a lack of ‘substance,' give a chance to cure (make amends) meaning that the reply ignored, the lawful points made within the document.

Any rebuttal provided without evidence on paper to prove the rebuttal is without substance, solidity, or merit.

Here's an example of how notices could be given, for example, to “Fake Courts"…

‘Notice of Understanding and Intent' (if nothing is pending, you can offer your ‘lawful understanding’ with the ‘intent to educate’ the man or woman served with it),...

#1 'Notice of Conditional Acceptance': which is a 'Notice of clarification request' (similar to the ‘Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure’, but by simply asking for clarification if no reply, or to clarify any points made)...

#2 'Notice of Default and Chance to Cure': We are not looking for closure; the case is open because we are seeking restitution for their harassment and demands, so try flipping the script on them. If the requesting parties have not settled the dispute, more notices are issued: 'Notice of Treason Misprision'; 'Notice of Coercion to Aid and Abet High Treason'; 'Notice to Stop'; ‘Notice of Non-Jurisdiction’; ‘Notice of Lawful Obligation’; ‘Notice of Wilful Ignorance’; ‘Notice of No Confidence’... and or anything else you’d like to create honestly.

‘Affidavits of Truth’

Affidavits of truth are frequently sworn under penalty of perjury (by the Affiant) and are extraordinarily powerful procedural instruments under common law.

An Affidavit is frequently composed of a sworn declaration of truth with numbered points of evidenced facts 1) 2) 3) 4) and so on, inside that sworn declaration that must be rebutted, point for point, or, the ‘Affidavit’ will become YOUR Truth in Law.

“Everything stated must be completely evidential”..!

An ‘Affidavit’ can only be rebutted by another ‘Affidavit’ under the same terms and conditions (under the penalty of perjury) that addresses each and every numbered point by point...

Every point must be responded to by the challenging ‘Affiant’ and
proven to be ‘false in substance’....and ALL must be sworn under penalty of perjury.

Denying all other alleged 'jurisdictions' other than a properly convened common law court of public record, or a 'Court De Jure' and in open forum (so that justice can be seen to be done), is critical when it comes to receiving summonses (invitations) to their so-called "courts of law," which are not courts of law but 'Cestui Que Vie' TRUST hearings, conducted under ‘treasonous and fraudulent rules' not laws…

Accepting the arbitral SERVICE of the corrupt criminal "courts" that have formed inside the Isles of Great Britain and the Commonwealth, particularly after the Treasonous Government of Edward Heath shoehorned us into the EEC, and much earlier in these days of institutionalised treason, is a criminal act.

These so-called courts are using treasonous laws to enrich themselves with the money of the uninformed/ignorant public, who generally believe that the 'legal' system is lawful when it plainly is not, and that they are obedient to it, which no one can be.