1/2
It will be validated in due time.
My LLM was granted on the 15th May 2008.
It was submitted in Feb 2008. My proposal dates to versions between June and Nov 2007.
The papers that precede this go back as far as mid 2006.
My Masters in Statistics will be next. There are a number of papers associated with this, not the dissertation, but the ones leading to it.
A full dossier will be put together. My work on Systems engineering and Poisson and Binomial functions and on Risk models.
Intermediaries or third parties are the same thing. In common language, we call these Third Parties.
In law, they are intermediaries.
he seems to have missed the entire nature of my research, if you simply accept that an intermediary is a third-party using legal terminology you can start to see that the entire focus of my study in Northumbria was in this area
more importantly, it was not about digital gold. My studies were around digital cash for Internet payments. In this, I looked at micropayments and in particular existing peer-to-peer systems and failures. The problem with systems such as Visa or even PayPal at the time were that the cost of doing a transaction with another party precluded many of the initial possibilities that were foreseen with the Internet.
It took me many more years to finish the base aspects of metanet, but they are well underway now
Bitcoin started well before the financial crash.
I know people want to associate bitcoin with the Wall Street occupy movement and many other anti-government things that existed, but it is nothing like that. Bitcoin is an evidence trail. If you look at the other aspects of my study in audit and forensics, you will see how it ties in. My work in auditing Sarbanes Oxley 302 and 404 and other aspects of financial systems is built into bitcoin
quite possibly but the administrative side of things was never my strong suit
I've no idea what your name it.
The one thing I was never any good at was marketing.
In order to create bitcoin, I had to study to a postgrad level all of the following:
- Network theory
- Propagation theory
- Accounting and auditing
- Law
- Statistics and probability theory
- Perpetration theory
- Game theory
- Computer science
- Economics
- Risk and survival studies
So, the real problem that I find now is that I cannot isolate domains. In any of these fields experts have their own terms of art. I understand the all, however, with a grounding in so many separate fields of study, I no longer have the ability to pick the correct word for the correct person. The same terminology exists across fields where different acronyms are used. It is a shame that we don't have the same terminology used everywhere, but the reality is that us humans are messy
I have already been contacted by the privacy team at Northumbria University. There are people already seeking to validate my masters in law studies. I have approved it.
Generally speaking, universities don't approve requests about students. The comment from one of the people managing data protection at Northumbria in legal services is without giving away any information about his name:
_Although it appears that you have published this yourself, and therefore made your student ID ‘publically available’, the University has a standard policy of neither confirming not denying that someone is or was a student at the University without that persons consent, and for me to confirm that the paper was produced by you as a student of the University would naturally not be compatible with this position. I am therefore asking if you would like us to verify that the paper was produced by you as a student of Northumbria university or whether you would rather I respond with ‘neither confirm nor deny’?_
I have authorised the University and it will be confirmed shortly.
CSW
Ago 18, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1566129426131600?thread_ts=1566129426.131600&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2263
It will be validated in due time.
My LLM was granted on the 15th May 2008.
It was submitted in Feb 2008. My proposal dates to versions between June and Nov 2007.
The papers that precede this go back as far as mid 2006.
My Masters in Statistics will be next. There are a number of papers associated with this, not the dissertation, but the ones leading to it.
A full dossier will be put together. My work on Systems engineering and Poisson and Binomial functions and on Risk models.
Intermediaries or third parties are the same thing. In common language, we call these Third Parties.
In law, they are intermediaries.
he seems to have missed the entire nature of my research, if you simply accept that an intermediary is a third-party using legal terminology you can start to see that the entire focus of my study in Northumbria was in this area
more importantly, it was not about digital gold. My studies were around digital cash for Internet payments. In this, I looked at micropayments and in particular existing peer-to-peer systems and failures. The problem with systems such as Visa or even PayPal at the time were that the cost of doing a transaction with another party precluded many of the initial possibilities that were foreseen with the Internet.
It took me many more years to finish the base aspects of metanet, but they are well underway now
Bitcoin started well before the financial crash.
I know people want to associate bitcoin with the Wall Street occupy movement and many other anti-government things that existed, but it is nothing like that. Bitcoin is an evidence trail. If you look at the other aspects of my study in audit and forensics, you will see how it ties in. My work in auditing Sarbanes Oxley 302 and 404 and other aspects of financial systems is built into bitcoin
quite possibly but the administrative side of things was never my strong suit
I've no idea what your name it.
The one thing I was never any good at was marketing.
In order to create bitcoin, I had to study to a postgrad level all of the following:
- Network theory
- Propagation theory
- Accounting and auditing
- Law
- Statistics and probability theory
- Perpetration theory
- Game theory
- Computer science
- Economics
- Risk and survival studies
So, the real problem that I find now is that I cannot isolate domains. In any of these fields experts have their own terms of art. I understand the all, however, with a grounding in so many separate fields of study, I no longer have the ability to pick the correct word for the correct person. The same terminology exists across fields where different acronyms are used. It is a shame that we don't have the same terminology used everywhere, but the reality is that us humans are messy
I have already been contacted by the privacy team at Northumbria University. There are people already seeking to validate my masters in law studies. I have approved it.
Generally speaking, universities don't approve requests about students. The comment from one of the people managing data protection at Northumbria in legal services is without giving away any information about his name:
_Although it appears that you have published this yourself, and therefore made your student ID ‘publically available’, the University has a standard policy of neither confirming not denying that someone is or was a student at the University without that persons consent, and for me to confirm that the paper was produced by you as a student of the University would naturally not be compatible with this position. I am therefore asking if you would like us to verify that the paper was produced by you as a student of Northumbria university or whether you would rather I respond with ‘neither confirm nor deny’?_
I have authorised the University and it will be confirmed shortly.
CSW
Ago 18, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1566129426131600?thread_ts=1566129426.131600&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2263
Comments
Be the first to add a comment
Log in to comment