*“Statute of Monopolies Act 1623”.*
Section 1: Establishes: "All grants of penalty & dispensation are void for it is implied that the individual is acting under corporate or political instruction that 'are altogether contrary to the Lawes of this Realme, and so are... void.'"
This implies: Everyone, including but not limited to; the King, Judges, Magistrates, Clerks to the Justices, Barristers, Solicitors, Police Constables, Agents of the State/Crown; Traffic / Civil Enforcement Officers & Bailiff’s, stands equal before the law.
Proper & correct identification must be provided by Police Constables; including but not limited to; Agents of the State/Crown; Traffic / Civil Enforcement Officers & Bailiff’s
Without proper identification, all grants of penalty & dispensation are void…!!!
Examples: If a police constable fails to correctly identify themselves, provide warrant card; name & station (based); several legal & lawful procedural consequences may arise:
Challenges to Lawfulness of Actions: Arrests, searches, or penalties issued by an unidentified officer may be legally & lawfully challenged, potentially leading to cases being dismissed.
Wrongful Arrest & Detention: Mistaken identity or failure to properly identify suspects can result in wrongful arrests, which may lead to claims for compensation
Evidence Challenges: If identification procedures are not followed correctly, any evidence obtained may be challenged in court, potentially leading to cases being dismissed.
Human Rights Violations: Arresting or detaining someone without proper identification or justification can breach human rights laws, particularly under the ‘Human Rights Act 1998’
Civil Liability Risks: In cases where improper identification leads to harm or wrongful actions; Police Constabulary’s may face civil claims for damages.
Police Misconduct Investigations: Officers who fail to follow identification protocols may face disciplinary action or investigations by oversight bodies such as the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). (Good luck with that one; as they always have each others back)
Public Trust & Accountability Issues: Lack of transparency in police identification can erode public confidence (it already has) leading to scrutiny & reluctant policy changes.
Section 1: Establishes: "All grants of penalty & dispensation are void for it is implied that the individual is acting under corporate or political instruction that 'are altogether contrary to the Lawes of this Realme, and so are... void.'"
This implies: Everyone, including but not limited to; the King, Judges, Magistrates, Clerks to the Justices, Barristers, Solicitors, Police Constables, Agents of the State/Crown; Traffic / Civil Enforcement Officers & Bailiff’s, stands equal before the law.
Proper & correct identification must be provided by Police Constables; including but not limited to; Agents of the State/Crown; Traffic / Civil Enforcement Officers & Bailiff’s
Without proper identification, all grants of penalty & dispensation are void…!!!
Examples: If a police constable fails to correctly identify themselves, provide warrant card; name & station (based); several legal & lawful procedural consequences may arise:
Challenges to Lawfulness of Actions: Arrests, searches, or penalties issued by an unidentified officer may be legally & lawfully challenged, potentially leading to cases being dismissed.
Wrongful Arrest & Detention: Mistaken identity or failure to properly identify suspects can result in wrongful arrests, which may lead to claims for compensation
Evidence Challenges: If identification procedures are not followed correctly, any evidence obtained may be challenged in court, potentially leading to cases being dismissed.
Human Rights Violations: Arresting or detaining someone without proper identification or justification can breach human rights laws, particularly under the ‘Human Rights Act 1998’
Civil Liability Risks: In cases where improper identification leads to harm or wrongful actions; Police Constabulary’s may face civil claims for damages.
Police Misconduct Investigations: Officers who fail to follow identification protocols may face disciplinary action or investigations by oversight bodies such as the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). (Good luck with that one; as they always have each others back)
Public Trust & Accountability Issues: Lack of transparency in police identification can erode public confidence (it already has) leading to scrutiny & reluctant policy changes.
Comments
Be the first to add a comment
Log in to comment