In the case of Stewart v. Wyoming Ranche Co., 128 U.S. 383, 388 (1888), 🇺🇸 to wit: Legal Maxim: ‘Aliud est tacere, aliud celare’, ~ a suppression of the truth may amount to a suggestion of falsehood.
And if, with intent to deceive, either party to a contract of sale conceals or suppresses a material fact, which he is in good faith bound to disclose, this is evidence of and equivalent to a false representation, because the concealment or suppression is, in effect, a representation that what is disclosed is the whole truth.
The gist of the action is fraudulently producing a false impression upon the mind of the other party; and, if this result is accomplished, it is unimportant whether the means of accomplishing it are words or acts of the defendant, or his concealment or suppression of material facts not equally within the knowledge or reach of the plaintiff.
NOTE: This can be used against those in positions of trust who deliberately mislead the public as the safety of vaccines 💉
And if, with intent to deceive, either party to a contract of sale conceals or suppresses a material fact, which he is in good faith bound to disclose, this is evidence of and equivalent to a false representation, because the concealment or suppression is, in effect, a representation that what is disclosed is the whole truth.
The gist of the action is fraudulently producing a false impression upon the mind of the other party; and, if this result is accomplished, it is unimportant whether the means of accomplishing it are words or acts of the defendant, or his concealment or suppression of material facts not equally within the knowledge or reach of the plaintiff.
NOTE: This can be used against those in positions of trust who deliberately mislead the public as the safety of vaccines 💉
Comments
Be the first to add a comment
Log in to comment