Whistleblower shares shocking details of corruption of peer review process in climate science...
The following describes how activist scientists successfully censored a recent climate paper:
"There is absolutely no allegation of research fraud or misconduct here, just simple disagreement. Instead of countering arguments and evidence via the peer reviewed literature, activist scientists teamed up with activist journalists to pressure a publisher – Springer Nature, perhaps the world’s most important scientific publisher – to retract a paper. Sadly, the pressure campaign worked."
via https://open.substack.com/pub/rogerpielkejr/p/think-of-the-implications-of-publishing?r=el4t7&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
@TheStarkNakedBrief
The following describes how activist scientists successfully censored a recent climate paper:
"There is absolutely no allegation of research fraud or misconduct here, just simple disagreement. Instead of countering arguments and evidence via the peer reviewed literature, activist scientists teamed up with activist journalists to pressure a publisher – Springer Nature, perhaps the world’s most important scientific publisher – to retract a paper. Sadly, the pressure campaign worked."
via https://open.substack.com/pub/rogerpielkejr/p/think-of-the-implications-of-publishing?r=el4t7&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
@TheStarkNakedBrief
Comments
Be the first to add a comment
Log in to comment