My life, one is almost embarrassed to admit, has contrived to reassemble itself. Not elegantly—nothing so theatrical—but with the quiet persistence of something that refuses, quite stubbornly, to remain broken. It did, of course, fall apart. Spectacularly, at times. There were years—far too many to be dismissed as a mere interlude—when I was less a man than a collection of fragments, held together by habit and a certain perverse refusal to disappear entirely.
One learns, in such periods, that collapse is rarely dramatic in the way novels promise. It is instead administrative. Papers go unsigned, days go unmarked, purpose becomes negotiable. And yet, somehow, one continues. It is the most irritating feature of existence.
Now, imagine—if one can tolerate the exercise—having brought something into being. Not merely an idea, but a mechanism, a system, a form of cash whispered into existence and left, rather carelessly, to circulate. Imagine having suggested, hinted, perhaps even declared its nature, only to watch as it finds its audience.
And then imagine, with a certain grim amusement, that the only enthusiast to arrive promptly is the devil.
It is a vulgar metaphor, of course, but vulgarity has its uses. One creates with intent, or at least with a theory of intent, and the world responds not with the anticipated chorus of rational actors but with something altogether more feral. Adoption is never dignified. It is messy, opportunistic, and deeply revealing of the creatures who first recognise utility when they see it.
There is a peculiar isolation in that realisation. Not pride—pride would be too simple—but a kind of cold observation. One sets a system into motion, and the earliest participants are not the philosophers, nor the careful stewards, but those who see immediately how it may be bent, tested, exploited, or worn like a mask.
And so, yes—life collapses, and life reconstitutes itself. Not because it is deserved, but because it persists. And what one has made continues also, indifferent to the condition of its maker, circulating through hands one would not choose, in contexts one did not design, answering questions that were never asked quite that way.
There is no tragedy in this. Only consequence.
And consequence, unlike reputation, has the decency to be honest.
S. Tominaga, alias CSW
april 28, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2048759776688091469
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5302
One learns, in such periods, that collapse is rarely dramatic in the way novels promise. It is instead administrative. Papers go unsigned, days go unmarked, purpose becomes negotiable. And yet, somehow, one continues. It is the most irritating feature of existence.
Now, imagine—if one can tolerate the exercise—having brought something into being. Not merely an idea, but a mechanism, a system, a form of cash whispered into existence and left, rather carelessly, to circulate. Imagine having suggested, hinted, perhaps even declared its nature, only to watch as it finds its audience.
And then imagine, with a certain grim amusement, that the only enthusiast to arrive promptly is the devil.
It is a vulgar metaphor, of course, but vulgarity has its uses. One creates with intent, or at least with a theory of intent, and the world responds not with the anticipated chorus of rational actors but with something altogether more feral. Adoption is never dignified. It is messy, opportunistic, and deeply revealing of the creatures who first recognise utility when they see it.
There is a peculiar isolation in that realisation. Not pride—pride would be too simple—but a kind of cold observation. One sets a system into motion, and the earliest participants are not the philosophers, nor the careful stewards, but those who see immediately how it may be bent, tested, exploited, or worn like a mask.
And so, yes—life collapses, and life reconstitutes itself. Not because it is deserved, but because it persists. And what one has made continues also, indifferent to the condition of its maker, circulating through hands one would not choose, in contexts one did not design, answering questions that were never asked quite that way.
There is no tragedy in this. Only consequence.
And consequence, unlike reputation, has the decency to be honest.
S. Tominaga, alias CSW
april 28, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2048759776688091469
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5302
Comments
Be the first to add a comment
Log in to comment