Let me make this entirely clear.

The court case is entirely about the origins of bitcoin and Satoshi.

For all the core people out there trying to play this down, there is nothing in this court case if I'm not Satoshi

The issue Is that Ira Kleiman seeks to promote Dave Kleiman as 50% of Satoshi. That is not correct

I don't deny that I had Dave in my life giving moral support and I don't deny that after 2011 we worked together on a few projects

I don't deny that I tried to invite him to work on bitcoin in 2008

I don't deny that I tried to give me contract for work in 2009 that he didn't accept and this led to a venture capital funded company called Greyfog In Australia that produced devices that used the Blockchain in 2009.

However, Dave never accepted the contract as he was too ill and I ended up taking other people who were directors and shareholders in that company including John Keeble and others in the venture ( vulture) capital field

CSW
Oct 30, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1635621574238900?thread_ts=1635621574.238900&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3254