It is the same phenomenon already observed for hurricanes and tornadoes. Moreover, reporting has improved because civil protection systems have reached higher organizational levels in many parts of the world; at the same time, the levels of interconnection with international organizations have improved and this should be highlighted as a positive element. <<
Quelle: "A critical assessment of extreme events trends in times of global warming", The European Physical Journal Plus, 13.01.2022

[2]
Quelle: "IPCC Sixth Assessment Report"

[3]
Zitat: >> One of the most interesting things researchers have discovered since MODIS began collecting measurements, noted Randerson, is a decrease in the total number of square kilometers burned each year. Between 2003 and 2019, that number has dropped by roughly 25 percent. <<
Quelle: "Building a Long-Term Record of Fire", NASA - Earth observatory, 21.08.2019

[4]
Zitat: >>Here we analyse 35 years’ worth of satellite data and provide a comprehensive record of global land-change dynamics during the period 1982–2016. We show that—contrary to the prevailing view that forest area has declined globally — tree cover has increased by 2.24 million km2 (+7.1% relative to the 1982 level) <<
Quelle: "Global land change from 1982 to 2016", Nature, 08.08.2018

[5]
Quelle: "Seasonal Trend for Europe (2023)", GWIS - Statistics Portal

[6]
Zitat: >> I have been contacted by a whistleblower with a remarkable story of corruption of the academic peer-review process involving a paper published in 2022.
[...]
Following its publication, the paper was discussed a bit on several blogs but did not get much attention (I Tweeted on it at the time). Then, eight months later following some discussion of the paper in the Australian media, The Guardian wrote an article severely criticizing the paper. The Guardian quoted four scientists critical of the paper: Greg Holland, Lisa Alexander, Steve Sherwood, and Michael Mann. Michael Mann was scathing and personal in his comments:“another example of scientists from totally unrelated fields coming in and naively applying inappropriate methods to data they don’t understand. Either the consensus of the world’s climate experts that climate change is causing a very clear increase in many types of weather extremes is wrong, or a couple of nuclear physics dudes in Italy are wrong.” <<
Quelle: "Think of the Implications of Publishing", The Honest Broker, 17.07.2023

[8]
Zitat: >> "Ein Prüfer schrieb: "S. McIntyre und R. McKitrick haben einen bemerkenswerten Artikel über einen sehr wichtigen Gegenstand verfasst. Die Bedeutung dieses Artikels liegt darin, dass sie zeigen, dass eine der wichtigsten und bekanntesten Ergebnisse der Klimaforschung, nämlich das Hockeyschläger-Diagramm von Mann et al., auf einem Fehler in der Anwendung einer mathematischen Technik basiert, die als Hauptkomponentenanalyse bekannt ist." Derselbe Prüfer fügte hinzu: "McIntyre und McKitrick fanden eine nicht dem Standard entsprechende Normalisierungsprozedur in der Analyse von Mann et al., die große Auswirkungen auf deren Ergebnisse hat… Die von Mann et al. verwendete Standardisierungsmethode tendiert dazu, Daten mit Hockeyschläger-Form signifikant hervorzuheben.
[...]
Als wir Manns Methode auf das Rote Rauschen anwendeten, erzeugten wir ständig Hockeyschläger- Kurven mit einer Aufwärtsbiegung am Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts. Wir haben diese Simulationen tausende Male wiederholt, und in 99 Prozent der Fälle war das Ergebnis der HKA ein Hockeyschläger." <<
Quelle: "Risse im Klima-Konsens, Heise Online, 22.02.2005

[9]
Quelle: "Hockey sticks, principal components, and spurious significance", GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 32, L03710, Received 14 October 2004; accepted 17 January 2005; published 12
February 2005.
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2004GL021750