If BTC Core truly believed that their version represented the original concept of Bitcoin, then why avoid the simplest path to validation?
In court, they had every opportunity to place the original design under scrutiny, to compare Satoshi’s own words and vision against what they now call Bitcoin.
Yet, they sidestepped it.
They carefully carved out history, excluding everything that mattered—Satoshi’s statements, the purpose embedded within the original white paper, and the years that bridged 2014 to Bitcoin’s creation. This omission is not accidental; it is a deliberate evasion. If they sought to prove me wrong, they had their chance. They could have shown that BTC aligns with the original principles, that it holds true to what Bitcoin was meant to be. But they run from it, shielding their narrative from the reality that such a comparison would expose.
They reject transparency and instead weave a mythology, twisting Bitcoin’s legacy into something unrecognisable. The irony is undeniable: the defenders of BTC, so eager to dismiss me, refuse the very evidence that could substantiate their claims.
In the end, their avoidance is the clearest admission that they cannot reconcile their creation with the original concept they pretend to embody.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 5, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1853652561997566217?t=OjSnI3Wt8t8e-TN9LceIGA&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1825
In court, they had every opportunity to place the original design under scrutiny, to compare Satoshi’s own words and vision against what they now call Bitcoin.
Yet, they sidestepped it.
They carefully carved out history, excluding everything that mattered—Satoshi’s statements, the purpose embedded within the original white paper, and the years that bridged 2014 to Bitcoin’s creation. This omission is not accidental; it is a deliberate evasion. If they sought to prove me wrong, they had their chance. They could have shown that BTC aligns with the original principles, that it holds true to what Bitcoin was meant to be. But they run from it, shielding their narrative from the reality that such a comparison would expose.
They reject transparency and instead weave a mythology, twisting Bitcoin’s legacy into something unrecognisable. The irony is undeniable: the defenders of BTC, so eager to dismiss me, refuse the very evidence that could substantiate their claims.
In the end, their avoidance is the clearest admission that they cannot reconcile their creation with the original concept they pretend to embody.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 5, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1853652561997566217?t=OjSnI3Wt8t8e-TN9LceIGA&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1825
Comments
Be the first to add a comment
Log in to comment