This is Baroness Sue Carr.
She is the Lady Chief Justice of England and Wales.
She represents the judiciary to govt and parliament, manages the judiciary with training and guidance, and handles complaints against judges via the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office—among a number of other duties.
Yesterday, she condemned criticism of judges' decisions as "unacceptable".
It marked an unbelievable moment where England's top judge suggested that the judiciary should not receive criticism from our elected representatives.
To recap, both Starmer (surprising) and Badenoch criticised a judge—who's been accused of having a pro-immigration bias—for granting a family of 6 seeking to flee Gaza the right to live in the UK, despite them using a scheme meant for Ukrainian refugees.
The judge, Hugo Norton-Taylor, basically tried to make a new law with no democratic mandate.
Yet, Baroness Carr added that she was “deeply troubled” by condemnation of Norton-Taylor's decision.
If this attitude reflects the culture she has fostered in the judiciary...
No wonder we've seen some of the harshest sentences for speech-related "crimes" since her appointment in Oct 2023.
You're not meant to say this but the biases of judges is one of the next scandals waiting to explode.
There's so much evidence out there...
via https://dailysceptic.org/2025/02/19/starmer-hits-back-at-top-judge-who-criticised-him-for-publicly-opposing-immigration-rulings/
@TheStarkNakedBrief
She is the Lady Chief Justice of England and Wales.
She represents the judiciary to govt and parliament, manages the judiciary with training and guidance, and handles complaints against judges via the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office—among a number of other duties.
Yesterday, she condemned criticism of judges' decisions as "unacceptable".
It marked an unbelievable moment where England's top judge suggested that the judiciary should not receive criticism from our elected representatives.
To recap, both Starmer (surprising) and Badenoch criticised a judge—who's been accused of having a pro-immigration bias—for granting a family of 6 seeking to flee Gaza the right to live in the UK, despite them using a scheme meant for Ukrainian refugees.
The judge, Hugo Norton-Taylor, basically tried to make a new law with no democratic mandate.
Yet, Baroness Carr added that she was “deeply troubled” by condemnation of Norton-Taylor's decision.
If this attitude reflects the culture she has fostered in the judiciary...
No wonder we've seen some of the harshest sentences for speech-related "crimes" since her appointment in Oct 2023.
You're not meant to say this but the biases of judges is one of the next scandals waiting to explode.
There's so much evidence out there...
via https://dailysceptic.org/2025/02/19/starmer-hits-back-at-top-judge-who-criticised-him-for-publicly-opposing-immigration-rulings/
@TheStarkNakedBrief
Comments
Be the first to add a comment
Log in to comment