You're throwing around the term "strawman" without a clue what it actually means—typical empty bluster.

A strawman fallacy involves distorting someone's argument into something weaker or exaggerated to attack it easily—but what you're calling exaggeration isn't distortion, it's economic fact. A "store of value," in any serious financial definition, demands stability; volatility isn't some minor inconvenience you shrug off, it's a fundamental failure.

You say "resilience," but resilience isn't stability—it's just surviving the chaos you created yourself.

Quoting a 2022 HBR article (paid puff piece) on crypto asset dynamics doesn't change the economic reality that BTC's wild swings render it unfit for genuine, reliable storage of value.

And censorship resistance?

Another fantasy. Bitcoin’s ledger is public, open, entirely traceable—not exactly the hallmark of resistance. Calling out these factual failures isn't hyperbole, nor is it a logical fallacy; it's plain economic reasoning and common sense.

You've misused "strawman" because you can't face reality, can't handle your illusions stripped bare. There's your fallacy—not mine.

S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Mar 24, 2025
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1904050673274282173?t=EtdamVdtxBQ3SdD7l1QZDw&s=19

https://t.me/S_Tominaga/2739