( AUTOMATIC TRANSLATION FROM GERMAN TO ENGLISH. Because of the possible errors in the translation, I ask for your understanding !!! )
Why do I consider the term “4 industrial revolution” to be a propagandistic term and window dressing?
Industrial revolutions mainly take place within the industrial, commercial or transport companies ect. They happen spontaneously, according to the progress of innovation and do not require any control from above. This applies, for example, to innovations in areas such as robotization, innovations, data processing, etc., with the respective producers and other actors introducing the changes and not some world organization such as the UN, World Bank, etc. And certainly not the WHO.
This is more of a dangerous, resource-saving, social upheaval in which, in an absurd way, man himself is the most important resource. It is a new stage from the ordinary class struggle, from which countless other agendas are intended to distract us and produce chaos.
In order to be able to achieve anything, we should first and foremost start ordering the terms and calling things as they actually are, for example : - an ordinary class struggle - new phase of oppression - several psychological operations at the same time - A ordinary one ( ! ), now completely privatized, industrial progress in which the general public is not allowed to participate. - deep, social regression: abolition of rights fought for over centuries, often in blood. - It is an attempted, blatant upheaval in the sociological sphere, which has nothing to do with a revolution, but represents a regression. Industrial progress is only used as a kind of smokescreen, strongly pushed forward into the perspective. The aim of the agenda is to make transhumanism the talk of the town, not the usual class struggle.