The sheer absurdity of the COPA case lies in its deliberate erasure of the very writings that form the foundation of Bitcoin—those authored by Satoshi Nakamoto. Imagine a case purportedly centred on the identity of Satoshi, yet it excludes any reference to the creator's own words, works, or publications prior to 2014.
This is not merely a procedural oversight; it is an intentional strategy to suppress the core ideas that define both the identity and philosophy behind Bitcoin.
Think about the implications.
The writings of Satoshi Nakamoto are pivotal, not just for understanding Bitcoin’s technical architecture but for grasping the conceptual framework that Satoshi sought to establish. By barring these writings, the court effectively stripped the case of its most relevant evidence.
How can one litigate over the identity of Satoshi while simultaneously silencing Satoshi’s voice?
The irony here is profound—this isn’t a pursuit of truth but an exercise in obfuscation.
What’s particularly galling is the broader consequence: the deliberate suppression of ideas.
This case wasn’t just about who Satoshi is; it was about silencing the principles and truths embedded in those early communications.
These ideas challenge the narrative COPA and its partners wish to propagate, and by excluding them, the court turned a case about intellectual and historical truth into a hollow procedural exercise.
The distinction in my approach is clear. I seek to bring these ideas into the open, using the court as a platform to expose the truth and ensure the foundational concepts of Bitcoin are not lost to revisionist agendas.
The suppression of these writings does not merely distort the case—it betrays the very principles of openness and truth that Satoshi espoused.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854727846704587114?t=20HASylYNu7XodrXCMG0Zg&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1882
This is not merely a procedural oversight; it is an intentional strategy to suppress the core ideas that define both the identity and philosophy behind Bitcoin.
Think about the implications.
The writings of Satoshi Nakamoto are pivotal, not just for understanding Bitcoin’s technical architecture but for grasping the conceptual framework that Satoshi sought to establish. By barring these writings, the court effectively stripped the case of its most relevant evidence.
How can one litigate over the identity of Satoshi while simultaneously silencing Satoshi’s voice?
The irony here is profound—this isn’t a pursuit of truth but an exercise in obfuscation.
What’s particularly galling is the broader consequence: the deliberate suppression of ideas.
This case wasn’t just about who Satoshi is; it was about silencing the principles and truths embedded in those early communications.
These ideas challenge the narrative COPA and its partners wish to propagate, and by excluding them, the court turned a case about intellectual and historical truth into a hollow procedural exercise.
The distinction in my approach is clear. I seek to bring these ideas into the open, using the court as a platform to expose the truth and ensure the foundational concepts of Bitcoin are not lost to revisionist agendas.
The suppression of these writings does not merely distort the case—it betrays the very principles of openness and truth that Satoshi espoused.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854727846704587114?t=20HASylYNu7XodrXCMG0Zg&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1882
Comments
Be the first to add a comment
Log in to comment