Bill of Rights 1688.pdf
278.9 KB
Whereas: The ‘Bill of Rights Act’ 1689 clearly states:
"That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of a particular person before conviction are illegal and null & void ‘ab initio’ ~ “from their inception, for cause”.
On 21st July 1993, Betty Boothroyd; the woman; acting in the capacity of; and doing business as; the ‘Speaker of The House of Commons’; issued a reminder to the Courts. And said:
"There has of course, been no amendment to ‘Bill of Rights’… the House is entitled to expect that the ‘Bill of Rights’ will be fully respected by all those appearing before the Courts."
This states that conviction is necessary before a fine and/or penalty and/or forfeit can be imposed.
"That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of a particular person before conviction are illegal and null & void ‘ab initio’ ~ “from their inception, for cause”.
On 21st July 1993, Betty Boothroyd; the woman; acting in the capacity of; and doing business as; the ‘Speaker of The House of Commons’; issued a reminder to the Courts. And said:
"There has of course, been no amendment to ‘Bill of Rights’… the House is entitled to expect that the ‘Bill of Rights’ will be fully respected by all those appearing before the Courts."
This states that conviction is necessary before a fine and/or penalty and/or forfeit can be imposed.
Comments
Be the first to add a comment
Log in to comment