Letter of Clarity by David Robinson - Original Founder of ‘Lawful Dissent’ ~ October 20, 2016
·
Good evening constittuional protectors...

This is a (not so) brief explanation of why the remedy we use works, or has worked for us in the past.

Thanks to the committee of the barons for invoking article 61 of Magna Carta 1215, we have a lawful, peaceful remedy to tackle the injustices of the state in a peaceful manner, we don't take to the streets.

We Only deal with evidential facts and nothing more and we ONLY use English constitutional tenets in our arguments.

This is because anyone who opposing our standing will also be opposing the English Constitution which is tantamount to TREASON AT COMMON LAW. By the way...Blair did NOT legally repeal the 1795 Treasonable and Seditious practices Act when he brought in the Crime and disorder Act in 1998 (Chapter 36) like the imposters within government say. Of course, naturally you will need to check that constitutional law (common law) is a higher jurisdiction in the realm than the corporate rules being flung about by imposters and crooks within the establishment today, to be confident with the law to use it properly.

Please don't just believe what we state check it all out for yourselves but remember, the internet is awash with disinformation, just search for English constitution and see how many posts say that 'Britain' doesn't have one.

The argument they use is almost laughable, they say that we don't have a written, codified constitution like the USA (who incidentally took their constitution from ours) when evidently we DO have a written constitution that (has a system of protocols) is codified. It was created by the people over hundreds of years through revolutions and tyrannical regimes before this one. The constitution, when being fully observed supplies a good system of application of itself, therefore it is 'codified'.

The law… ‘IS OF THE PEOPLE’...which is why we are policed by consent in England. We all surely consent to the constitution as it protects the people and ensures justice is seen to be done. Unlike today in their corporate arenas, where deception and unaware peoples is a profitable practice indeed..

So... to the point. The regime works on presumption, they presume that you consent (and indeed you do if you comply with a summons of your own free will, or ignore their notices and letters). They presume that you are the corporate body and that you understand legalese and stand under their presumed (illegal) authority.

We remove all presumptions and provide evidence of article 61's invocation (Daily Telegraph report) plus other evidence (which can be seen in some of the processes we have succeeded with, in the files).

We state that we do not consent as the law FORBIDS us to do so at this time. We conditionally accept all demands on proof that they have the authority to make those demands since ‘Article 61's… invocation. The crown has NO authority whatsoever so neither do the so called courts, policy enforcers, councils etc.

‘Article 61’… is a royal command, it is commanded that we distress the Crown and the illegal regime by seizing castles, land etc, we all have LAWFUL: EXCUSE to do this and distress the regime in any way we see fit peacefully though, whilst also enjoying the freedom that 'duress of circumstances' provides us. Under duress you can comply with the regime if you rely on a car or whatever for example do not de-register the car or tax on it... you are also entitled to all your entitlements, it would be theft and coercion to aid and abet a treasonous regime to deny you them.

So... we go after every individual as a man/woman who makes any demands on us. We must compel them to stand under ‘Article 61’ too by law... everyone has the duty to do that whilst in lawful rebellion... this is apart of its strategy... only a united people can defeat treason from within. Unify under the common law which is common sense and just, is all we need to do.