Wright v Ryan & Anor [2005] NSWCA 368 (27 October 2005)

27 OCTOBER 2005

"CRAIG WRIGHT v MICHAEL RYAN & ANOR

CATCHWORDS

APPEAL – fresh evidence – additional evidence – requirements for in appeal from conviction for contempt of Court

EVIDENCE – circumstantial – repetitive conduct

EVIDENCE – fresh evidence – additional evidence – requirements for in appeal from conviction for contempt of Court

FACTS

The Supreme Court found the appellant guilty of contempt of Court by breaching undertakings given to the Court involving the carrying on of business in competition with and approaching customers of the second respondent. The appellant argued that the undertakings were too ambiguous and uncertain to be enforced, that certain companies were not customers of the second respondent and that he had not breached the undertakings..."

http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/nsw/NSWCA/2005/368.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=%22craig%20wright