Similarly, in British Airways Plc v Spencer [2021] EWHC 106 (QB), the court permitted intervention due to significant financial harm and the reliance on previous agreements. The miners and developers here similarly relied on the stability of the original protocol, and their financial losses as a result of the changes provide strong grounds for their participation.
Furthermore, in Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd v Sandoz Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 770, the court allowed intervention where the third parties had a substantial economic interest in the commercial dispute. This case highlights that intervention can be justified by financial stakes alone, reinforcing the legal standing of miners, developers, and businesses to join the current case based on their direct economic loss from BTC Core’s actions.
2/2
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Oct 22, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1848690435100946861?t=Wd1Frn7-Gp9UIuT4grY-CA&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1638
Furthermore, in Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd v Sandoz Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 770, the court allowed intervention where the third parties had a substantial economic interest in the commercial dispute. This case highlights that intervention can be justified by financial stakes alone, reinforcing the legal standing of miners, developers, and businesses to join the current case based on their direct economic loss from BTC Core’s actions.
2/2
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Oct 22, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1848690435100946861?t=Wd1Frn7-Gp9UIuT4grY-CA&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1638
Comments
Be the first to add a comment
Log in to comment