Here is something that surprisingly ( or not) many miss.
Atheist and evolutionists(not necessarily synonymous) say life came from a "primordial soup". Basically, carbon, oxygen and more formed randomly and life arose from random element combinations.
Please follow the logic here. Proteins make DNA, DNA makes proteins. In the inert primordial randomness which came first? To have one the other is necessary. I think it would be simple to see, both were simultaneously created.
As the proverbial chicken and egg? Doesn't Scripture say "all the beasts of the field"? Wouldn't it simple to say God created living creatures with the ability to reproduce?
Now, understanding then how to resolve randomness from design let's continue. The Rainbow is a refracted white light showing the seven bands of pure light. [Side note] 7 Biblically is completeness. The Holy Spirit is represented throughout all Scripture as 7 lights. White representing purity, the perfect wholeness and Holiness of God. The Homosexual rainbow contains 6 bands. With one color missing, it cannot represent purity. It cannot recombine to make white light. Therefore (is it a stretch or logical?) Homosexuality could, to some also represent the desire to eliminate white from the equality model. I would never presume to conclude that white makes right or whiteness represents purity. I am an artist. I primarily paint as my choice of visual expression. Human skin is emulated by mixing the primaries in a certain proportions to produce a dark coffee like brown. Racial tones are created by adding varying amounts of white and occasionally an adjustment to the primary variation. I can paint representations of every race and all sub variants with three colors and white. We literally are all the same color. I separate man's perception from Biblical representation because God's knowledge is not parallel to our human perception. Going back to the rainbow and man's conscious and unconscious perception, let's consider something. What came first the rejection of purity or the impurity? Paul wrote that having rejected God, he gave "them"(perverts) up to vial affections and lusts. Therefore perversion cannot stand in light or exist within purity otherwise we have an unresolvable oxymoron. So the impurity of Homosexuality resists the presence of white. And oddly and erroneously White represents to the impure "purity, Holiness, goodness" and let's explore leftist terminologies, White, European Christians.
So to be racist is a blasphemous assertion that God made mistakes in the process of creation. Racism is tied to the rejection of God. And, logically, the giving them up to vial affections and lusts? The Greek reveals this statement is clearly about sexual perversion.
There's much more to this point than can be discussed here. However, isn't it striking how the rainbow warriors despise whiteness in all it's implied representations? Is it surprising that the sexualizing of children is associated by the left as an attack on the "hateful white Christians"? The fact is children are being sacrificed on the altar of reverence for the perversions of the Godless.
Fight for the children. Fight for them!