I'll take an agnry white guy over any other option

🤘‍ 🤘‍ 🤘‍

The crime statistics tell a different story.

Okay, then they should probably stop making white men angry with their racist anti-white propaganda

CNN: Migrants are being forced to defend themselves violently because of their desperate situation - find the error

Blacks with a small percentage of the population kill more whites than whites kill blacks.

I really don't like this anti-albino hate mongering.

This is correct, as in: they're scared of us.

He's so frightened that he can write a pure bs article like that with zero fear of repercussions. The reality is there is nothing more frightening than the Jewish media using blacks and other groups to demonize whites to help with their goal of total white replacement/genocide.

I think the danger is to then make this about white vs black. Instead of just saying this is wrong period

At last... and I hope CNN will be made to pay for their part for pushing the situation this far

Hopefully that is true because I am a white woman and definitely pissed off.

They never do anything about the causes of our anger, except intensify them

I don't know if I should consider it intriguing or amusing that when the same CNN reported with a similar tone about apartheid South Africa just a generation ago, ALL Anglo-SUCKsin nations shared FAKE MEDIA's centiments.

I can't help to wonder how Anglo-SUCKsins came to the conclusion that when white Afrikaners are being reported as angry, they're racist, but if a white Anglo-SUCKsin is angry, he's anger is justified.

May I remind Anglo-SUCKsins that ALL the SUCKsin nations supported a communist takeover in South Africa.

Please help me understand how my ignorant cousins came to the conclusion that communism is good for South Africa, but bad for Anglo-SUCKsin nations?

I've asked this question countless times and every time just met with a blank stare.

Any SUCKsin can help me make some sense out of this obvious and blatant discrepancy?