Ever been told that "human" secretly means "Hu-man" — colour plus man, a hidden mark of servitude?
It's a myth!
"Human" isn't two English words joined together; it comes into English whole, from a single Latin word — humanus — kin to homo (man) and humus (the earth). Its oldest sense is the earth-born mortal: the creature of the ground, set against the immortal gods.
There is no "colour" in it anywhere, and "hue" (colour) is an entirely separate word, of Germanic descent, that never once touched Latin.
The "Hu + man" split is folk etymology — the same error as claiming "history" comes from "his story" (it's really the Greek historia, "inquiry").
"Human" brands no one a servant or a slave. It means, quite simply, a living man or woman — a member of mankind. The word takes nothing from us..!
See the attached PDF for a fuller more in depth explanation.
I’ve often wondered how the hu-man English (mis)interpretation could credibly carry over into other languages with different etymological roots for words.
The mere fact that the guy in the link you provided starts banging on about religion, informed me immediately that he wasn’t as enlightened as he thought he was. Therefore anything he had to say from that point on was meaningless. Religion and Fear are two of the oldest tools of power and control. That isn’t to say that there isn’t a God. No one can prove that either way. It is a belief. As for the term Human I prefer to stick to what I can find and see for myself Not someones interpretation of what he thinks a book called the Bible has to say…
Interesting. Balentine's Law Dictionary 1930 apparently says "see monster" when looking at the definition of 'human'. Always struggle with that word since learning that.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/554837572145095