58 comments

Show 17 more comments
it has been men who have protested against feminism, trans activism. grooming gangs, mass immigration etc etc etc.. because much like war, we want to protect our mother's, wives, and daughters. for doing so we have been demonised, unpersoned, and persecuted.. at the behest of leftist women, and their toady's.

the vast majority of women have said nothing, and done less, to support us, in trying to protect them, because most women will do nothing, unless a thing directly affects them negatively. it is the average woman's lack of involvement, or even simple support that has led to every 'politically created' issue, that now affects them, and men are now either unable, or unwilling, to help protect them from themselves.

they wanted equality.. and that is what they are getting, they wanted to look virtuous, so ignored common sense, and now they are competing professionally against men, and being flashed in changing rooms..

you reap what you sow, and there comes a point when you have to allow those you love, to live with their own mistakes, and hope they have it in them, to fix it themselves.
Hosea 8:7 quia ventum seminabunt et turbinem metent culmus
Michael
The USA doesn't have the intention to draft recruits anyway. So what is this really about? A pretext to register people?
Women can be valuable in the army and not necessarily in a combat role. They need nurses, doctors, cooks... not just canon fodder. I have no problem with women serving their country
Women in Israel are there for show. What I can tell you becomes of women in the US military is that they end up with a body count (not the kind a soldier is supposed to rack up) longer than an encyclopedia. They'll also often be assaulted by black soldiers and afraid to report it. So, no. Not a good idea.
The only women that belong with an army are camp followers
Funny since Iraq they have all the data to show not only are women physically incapable of performing male duties when injured they also die faster to to their FRAIL physiology. Not to mention they often refused to do anything remotely dangerous. Look up Pugil Stick fight to see what I mean they've known this for centuries.
Steve
No quality man would date a women who was in the military. This is a sign of a weak nation. Women have no place in the work force or in the voting booth.
Ngl lie but this sounds pretty sexist but it is actually true, a retired SF guy from India said the same thing very clearly that females are not built to fight, their biology doesn't allow that.
Friendly reminder that even Nazi Germany officials rather took the suicide pill than to send woman to the frontlines in mid 1945.
Steve
No quality man would date a women who was in the military. This is a sign of a weak nation. Women have no place in the work force or in the voting booth.
Hello caveman. Literally 95% of men disagree and are married and have families in mass with working women , includibg military women who later have kids. Insecure boy?
Valeri
Racist and sexist comment with no proof
Racist and sexist yes. As for proof, if you think tossing your daughter in as an enlisted surrounded by higher ranking blacks is a good idea go for it.
Show next 20 comments