That is not the only or even main point of a military.

biology.. men and women are not the same, men have evolved to better deal with conflict and injury.. from having greater bone density, tougher ligaments, to larger muscle mass.. and lets not forget the differences in natural psychological responses to many of the situations encountered in conflict.

countless..? each individual soldier is a counter to each individual apposing soldier. this is why their should be no difference in training requirements, or set ability. females in the military, and police forces, do not match the physical training standards of their male counterparts.. (unless those standards are uniformly reduced to accommodate them) because they are not physically equal, or able, to do so. countless is not an option, as countless isn't a provision, nor is it ever guaranteed. females are a liability, in any front line, combat focused station, where they have replaced a male. this isn't simply because they are not physically equal, but also because most men they fight beside, will have a natural predisposition, to assume a greater sense of responsibility for their female squad members wellbeing, than that of their primary function. all this is readily available information, is well researched, heavily documented, and peer reviewed. these are simple facts, it isn't sexist to point them out, nor is it an attempt to glorify 1 group, or demean another. ignoring reality is bad, people get hurt as a result.

Racist and sexist yes. As for proof, if you think tossing your daughter in as an enlisted surrounded by higher ranking blacks is a good idea go for it.

It makes no sense to have woman in the military. This is a bad move. And yes it is anti family.

in this i agree. when physical conflict can be as lame as fighting over the last sandwich in the plate. even when a dispute is upscaled to required armies, it can still be over something as lame. military conflict is largely broken down in 2 categories.. defense of held resources, or expansion for desired resources.. either by main force, or by proxy. with saber rattling, and the threat of conflict, being used as a political tool, too 'fortify' diplomacy, or sell arms. its all a terrible waste of life for us common folk, we never start these conflicts, we just die from them. misanthropic elites love to play their games, we are chattel to their murder machine, a means to their ends. i am only in agreement with female conscription from philosophical necessity as a life lesson, not from any moral position.. can women do war.. certainly! should they have to when men are better suited.. certainly not! to understand reality, you have to experience it.. just try and find a women, who has lived through direct conflict, and would choose to do so again, as a soldier, fighting with only other women at her side? i would be amazed if you could do so.

Not anti family. As israel has way more families per capita and kids, yet all woken have mandatory military service for decades

Woman have no place in war or conflict. Period. Making military service mandatory for woman will lead to less families and less kids. And no, you are factually incorrect about Israel. Israel has little to no woman in the military that actually have any serious position. What they want in America is the same as in Norway and Sweden. Extremely radical anti-family policies. It's litterally created to destroy families. Nothing else.

Woman have no place in war or conflict. Period. Making military service mandatory for woman will lead to less families and less kids. And no, you are factually incorrect about Israel. Israel has little to no woman in the military that actually have any serious position. What they want in America is the same as in Norway and Sweden. Extremely radical anti-family policies. It's litterally created to destroy families. Nothing else.

Wrong. But even if it was correct that's not the point anyways.