Prolific publication not always an indicator of research excellence, says Mai Har Sham #WCRI2019
#WCRI2019 Surely no assessment panel at any university in the world could honestly believe that it’s possible to publish a paper every 5 days?! BTW that’s a rhetorical question.
از ایران نیز نام شش محقق از جمله معاون آموزش وزیر بهداشت جزو نویسندگان هایپر پرولیفیک قرار دارند
https://t.me/scientometric/713
#WCRI2019 Surely no assessment panel at any university in the world could honestly believe that it’s possible to publish a paper every 5 days?! BTW that’s a rhetorical question.
از ایران نیز نام شش محقق از جمله معاون آموزش وزیر بهداشت جزو نویسندگان هایپر پرولیفیک قرار دارند
https://t.me/scientometric/713
18 comments
Log in to comment
Each project must be counted only for 1 researcher. It doesn't matter how many articles will be extracted, only 1 project will be counted. The citations will be counted for the project, even if a project has more than 1 article all citations will be linked to the project.
This pattern has many advantages:
1- The basis of the data is clear.
2- The authorship matter will be almost solved.
3- The project slicing for more articles will be almost solved.
هدف آن باید حل مشکلات جامعه و افزایش کیفیت زندگی باشد و‌نه افزایش صرف شاخص های علم سنجی