I was wondering how far they would go. If it would just be peoples who picture got taken Or everybody with a cell phone on or both. I guess it might be both. I suppose it being deemed an insurrection which to my limited knowledge on the subject is 10 years in prison and a find . Also what other crimes committed I’m guessed could also be tagged on the charges. Including terrorism charges if a group is deemed such. Like using certain symbols related to certain groups Or membership in such groups. Also the new public shamming laws of cancel culture effects lives as well . That’s just my guess.
Innocent? No criminal rioter who stormed Capitol literally during a Trump speech at the same time few miles away elsewhere( so they are no Trump fans either) and they did so during a constitutional certification process! Half way! Everyone knew it would achieve nothing, except causing potential harm. Nobody there was innocwnt.
You are a criminal by storming and rioting inside the Capitol. It's just a fact. Congress was endangered, high crime. They disrupted the constitutional certification process. It only makes sense everyone is hel accountable who did this
You are a criminal by storming and rioting inside the Capitol. It's just a fact. Congress was endangered, high crime. They disrupted the constitutional certification process. It only makes sense everyone is hel accountable who did this
Its a geofencing warrant which has extremely questionable legality and is probably unconstitutional. A lot of arrests from these will be challenged on the grounds they were unlawfully obtained.
Seems the prosecutors and lawyers don't either,clown. This is why lwt the adults do this,kid. You can sit and watch and eat your lollypop quietly. You might even learn something from the adults
You don't even know what geofencing is you retarded faggot let alone how it applies differently for different sorts of tech companies. Explain to me the difference between a geofencing subpoena served to Google vs one served to AT&T?
You don't even know the difference between a Google and an AT&T dragnet warrant. This clearly isn't a conversation for someone as thick as you. You probably don't even know what the 4th amendment is.