Mate you need to understand the difference between the definition of a scientific theory and the regular vernacular definition of the word. If your whole basis of germ theory being unproven is the use of the word theory then you're not educating yourself at all.
No I'm fully aware of the two, but the basis of my statement here is that viruses do not cause disease, they are merely a symptom of an underlying issue.
Nowhere in the definition of scientific theory does it state that they are proven or they are facts. It just states that they are CURRENTLY ACCEPTED. There is more evidence to support that diseases are spread in more of a sympathetic way than viruses being the cause. ie similar to what happens when your next to someone that yawns.
Look up germ theory, it's been mainstream science for over 150 years and still nobody has ever proven scientifically that germs cause sickness..
Strange right? If germs really did make people sick they would have surely been able to prove it right?
"The germ theory of disease is the currently accepted scientific theory for many diseases."
Meaning... It is still a THEORY, as in not fact.
If it was a FACT it would not be worded the way it is.
But this is the usual response, criticism, name calling and Zero evidence.
Here I'll help - read this before you look even sillier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
Nowhere in the definition of scientific theory does it state that they are proven or they are facts. It just states that they are CURRENTLY ACCEPTED.
There is more evidence to support that diseases are spread in more of a sympathetic way than viruses being the cause. ie similar to what happens when your next to someone that yawns.
But TPTB want you to fear your neighbor.
https://vexmansthoughts.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/bc3a9champ-or-pasteur-a-lost-chapter-in-history-of-biology.pdf