No, it's definitely a stock image, and it's roughly a dollar to licence online. They definitely didn't Photoshop out the watermark with the intention of stealing a $1 image for their laptop because the image would be low enough resolution to be grainy for a big object like that. I feel bad for the company for you to automatically villainize it lmaoo so many companies use stock photos, that's why they exist
Feel bad for the company?? Go on redbubble, teespring, society6, zazzle, gumroad, etc. You'll see companies /constantly/ stealing designs and directly taking money from me, or my other artist friends. It is constant and exhausting to fight to have them get removed. Most of the time they won't be taken down. Idk why you're defending these companies so vivaciously when they literally ruin people's livelihoods.
They took a common design used by multiple people, bought it and used it legally on a design. Many many companies do this, if not most. It's the reason why minimalist designs like this exist, to be used for accent designs
2. I'm not specifically talking about this image when when I mention that companies do this.
Anyway, I'm done talking about this.
Now leave me alone.