15 comments

Show 4 more comments
Deblina
Jon Doe (Pureblood)
It's not the baby's fault the mother was raped so why must the baby be killed because of that?
For the well-being (physical or mental or both) of the mother I guess this step is necessary. 
Ofcourse it’s not the baby’s fault that the mother was raped, neither it was the mother’s fault. There is no logical conclusion to this statement - u see!
Deblina
It’s already decriminalised now. It’s upto the mother now whether to opt for it or not. If you are not up for it, one shouldn’t do it. But at least the option is there now for those who want to abort.
I have seen the video. It’s sad but I would feel worse if the mother is not given an option to exercise her choice.
Angela Duncan
Deblina
For the well-being (physical or mental or both) of the mother I guess this step is necessary.  Ofcourse it’s not the baby’s fault that the mother was raped, neither it was the mother’s fault. There is no logical conclusion to this statement - u see!
Abortions for reasons of rape, incest and threats to physical health of mother and/or child account for less than 2%. The rest is contraception. And if the baby must be killed then why not restrict it to within the first 3 weeks where it won't feel pain from being literally ripped apart whilst alive.. And what's wrong with encouraging adoption instead. I think women who choose to adopt rather than abort should be praised as hero's.
Deblina
Angela Duncan
Abortions for reasons of rape, incest and threats to physical health of mother and/or child account for less than 2%. The rest is contraception. And if the baby must be killed then why not restrict it to within the first 3 weeks where it won't feel pain from being literally ripped apart whilst alive.. And what's wrong with encouraging adoption instead. I think women who choose to adopt rather than abort should be praised as hero's.
As I said in the first statement - choice to choose - should be there - even if it’s for 1% of women (the case numbers are much higher but just argument sake!). It’s simple- if you don’t want abortion, don’t go for it. You can nurture, you can put for adoption but in case someone wants to adopt at least now they have choice to do so. Each to their own desire, I cannot judge neither can anyone else.
Angela Duncan
Deblina
As I said in the first statement - choice to choose - should be there - even if it’s for 1% of women (the case numbers are much higher but just argument sake!). It’s simple- if you don’t want abortion, don’t go for it. You can nurture, you can put for adoption but in case someone wants to adopt at least now they have choice to do so. Each to their own desire, I cannot judge neither can anyone else.
I appreciate what you're saying but the baby is not given a choice. I think most ppl would be against capital punishment but for some reason it's ok to kill babies. If we found a single celled organism on mars we would immediately respect mars as an ecosystem and stay away. As I say, inconsistencies. I think there is a bigger agenda at work here. I can't speak for all abortion centres but planned parenthood makes shed loads from baby parts
Deblina
1. The process abortion is already decriminalised so no point discussing any further as it won’t change.
2. I believe abortion upto 26/28 weeks have gone legal not beyond that.
3. It might be sad, but I still stand for Having a Choice to choose.
The way some people’s kids turn out like I think parents should choose up till +40 yrs old. Who’s up for that?
It’s fucking horrible is what it is NO BABYS SHOULD BE ABORTED !! HOWEVER IN SOME CIRCUMSTANCES MAYBE BUT AT 25 weeks THATS MURDER!!! Cold blooded fuckin murder of a baby is about as bad as it gets!!!!!!!!