suppose vaccination kills us all? what would the pharmaceutical industry gain? what use is there if the customers die? With out us they don’t make money…
Erstens gibt es keine wirkliche Übersterblichkeit! Zweitens gab es Impfungen fast von Beginn an! Drittens im Verlaufe der Pandemie sind ja immer mehr Menschen erkrankt, also kannst du nicht einfach so darauf schließen. Viertens schau dir doch Statististiken zu Toden durch Corona und durch Impfungen an, ach ne stimmt die sind ja alle gefälscht
You are asking for speculation because you won't find any official information due to the assumption that these intentions are not directed to serve humanity but only a group or specific people.
I will answer your question regardless. There are many possible reasons why someone would want to spread something with hidden effects. You can find truths with different layers of thinking. Lets start with the trival layer; what is the main goal of a company? To make profit obviously. Companies like Pfizer made a lot of profit, you can look for at the share history, to see how much relavance they have gained. Governments profit as well due to tax, or other ways of financial inflow (such as "donations" to politicians, which then again is paid with the profits to keep the cycle running). Illness also is the reason why health companies profit, if we all were perfectly healthy they would not profit. The assumption to just kill us all would not fit to that picture. With this I would close the first part of the analysis that dealt with the things or patterns a person can immidiately think of. Now the next layers always start with an assumption, just like we need a net to catch fish we now create tools to catch them. To do that we begin with a hypothesis. I will take the one you provided and change it a bit "the vaccination can be used to kill someone", note this alone is a strong statement and it must be equally strong proven before accusing anyone, failing to do so even if unintentionally can be slander. Now I will continue; obviously having the power to just cover a death cause with a "1 in 144 chance of catastrophic side effects" (not factual, just an example) is an insanely effective way to kill. Anyone who does not fit the order can just die. Assuming of cause that it is possible that the vaccination behaves like a crushing bolder that can be pushed through the intake of another specific substance, or another form of trigger that I cannot guess.
Yet do we see that key figures that took the vaccination died? That would require us to know who exactly planned such a killswitch strategy and who and why these people had to die. I for one did not search for such evidance, so I cannot give an opinion in that matter.
Das ist falsch was du schreibst. Es geht nicht um Erkrankungen sondern um COVID Impfungen. Und nein..., Die ersten 10 Monate wurde nicht geimpft. Da lag die Anzahl der p.u.u. Toten bei etwa 10 am Tag. In dem Podcast wird das gut erklärt. Einfach Mal reinhören.
Das hat auch nichts mit der Übersterblichkeitsrate zu tun. Die ist übrigens auch um etwa 20% gestiegen.
Wenn man die demografischen Aspekte einbezieht, ist diese geringer. Dinge die ich selber gesehen habe, 2020 ein ehemaliger Klassenkamerad, genickbruch nach zuviel Alkohol Konsum und daraus resultierenden treppensturz. 2022, 3 ältere geimpfte Nachbarinnen Tod, der Vater einer Freundin, 4 1/2 Wochen nach Einzug ins Pflegeheim + 2booster, der vorgeschrieben ist, Tod.
Als jemand der im Studium gelernt hat, was pharmakovigilanz ist, prä und klinische Studien entworfen, und wie man echte Impfstoffe entwickelt, finde ich die Lüge es ist eine Impfung schon grässlich.
Die geleugnete übersterböichkeit korreliert mit der gentherapie, die über Jahre erzeugte Panik und die Maßnahmen, dürften besonders in der BRD dazu beigetragen haben.
Dies nicht zu untersuchen, keine root cause analyse machen, das grenzt langsam an fahrlässige Tötung.
Uwe
So plötzlich und unerwartet passiert nichts! Einfach zuhören, was die selbst so von sich geben genügt schon, wenn man die richtigen Schlüsse daraus zieht!
suppose vaccination kills us all? what would the pharmaceutical industry gain? what use is there if the customers die? With out us they don’t make money…
I will answer your question regardless. There are many possible reasons why someone would want to spread something with hidden effects. You can find truths with different layers of thinking. Lets start with the trival layer; what is the main goal of a company? To make profit obviously. Companies like Pfizer made a lot of profit, you can look for at the share history, to see how much relavance they have gained. Governments profit as well due to tax, or other ways of financial inflow (such as "donations" to politicians, which then again is paid with the profits to keep the cycle running). Illness also is the reason why health companies profit, if we all were perfectly healthy they would not profit. The assumption to just kill us all would not fit to that picture. With this I would close the first part of the analysis that dealt with the things or patterns a person can immidiately think of. Now the next layers always start with an assumption, just like we need a net to catch fish we now create tools to catch them. To do that we begin with a hypothesis. I will take the one you provided and change it a bit "the vaccination can be used to kill someone", note this alone is a strong statement and it must be equally strong proven before accusing anyone, failing to do so even if unintentionally can be slander. Now I will continue; obviously having the power to just cover a death cause with a "1 in 144 chance of catastrophic side effects" (not factual, just an example) is an insanely effective way to kill. Anyone who does not fit the order can just die. Assuming of cause that it is possible that the vaccination behaves like a crushing bolder that can be pushed through the intake of another specific substance, or another form of trigger that I cannot guess.
Yet do we see that key figures that took the vaccination died? That would require us to know who exactly planned such a killswitch strategy and who and why these people had to die. I for one did not search for such evidance, so I cannot give an opinion in that matter.
Und nein..., Die ersten 10 Monate wurde nicht geimpft. Da lag die Anzahl der p.u.u. Toten bei etwa 10 am Tag.
In dem Podcast wird das gut erklärt. Einfach Mal reinhören.
Das hat auch nichts mit der Übersterblichkeitsrate zu tun. Die ist übrigens auch um etwa 20% gestiegen.
Als jemand der im Studium gelernt hat, was pharmakovigilanz ist, prä und klinische Studien entworfen, und wie man echte Impfstoffe entwickelt, finde ich die Lüge es ist eine Impfung schon grässlich.
Die geleugnete übersterböichkeit korreliert mit der gentherapie, die über Jahre erzeugte Panik und die Maßnahmen, dürften besonders in der BRD dazu beigetragen haben.
Dies nicht zu untersuchen, keine root cause analyse machen, das grenzt langsam an fahrlässige Tötung.