file.pdf
61.8 KB
‘Clearfield Doctrine’
The Clearfield Doctrine (which Larry probably can't find, either) arises from a 1943 Supreme Court Case, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 US 363-371.
The essence of the case is that when an incorporated government uses private bank script as its currency it sinks to the level of any other incorporated entity, loses its sovereign status (if it ever had any) and becomes subject to the same laws as any other corporation.
The Clearfield Doctrine strips these pretenders of their "government" cloak and when they attempt to use the abusive powers of government to enrich themselves, it's time to remind them of exactly who and what they are.
This can be used against them in any number of contexts.
They claim to have a commercial interest in your marriage and children? Prove it..!
They claim to have a commercial interest in your home and land..? Prove it..!
They claim to have a commercial interest in your estate..? Prove it..!
They have a right to tax you for anything..? Income..? Property..? Prove it..!
“ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat” ~ “The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies”. Dig. 22, 3, 2; Tait on Ev. 1; 1 Phil. Ev. 194; 1 Green l. Ev. 74; 3 Louis. R. 83; 2 Dan. Pr. 408; 4 Bouv Inst. n. 4411
“Thou shalt not bear false witness: thou shalt not speak falsely before the King, nor before the Judge, nor in the assembly of the Princes, nor in the presence of the Ruler, nor unto the Minister of the Law, nor among the multitude; nor in the ear of thy friend, nor to thy wife, nor thy child, nor thy servant: neither shalt thou withhold the truth from the King, nor the Judge, nor him that is set in authority: for thus shall righteousness be established in all thy borders.”
The Clearfield Doctrine (which Larry probably can't find, either) arises from a 1943 Supreme Court Case, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 US 363-371.
The essence of the case is that when an incorporated government uses private bank script as its currency it sinks to the level of any other incorporated entity, loses its sovereign status (if it ever had any) and becomes subject to the same laws as any other corporation.
The Clearfield Doctrine strips these pretenders of their "government" cloak and when they attempt to use the abusive powers of government to enrich themselves, it's time to remind them of exactly who and what they are.
This can be used against them in any number of contexts.
They claim to have a commercial interest in your marriage and children? Prove it..!
They claim to have a commercial interest in your home and land..? Prove it..!
They claim to have a commercial interest in your estate..? Prove it..!
They have a right to tax you for anything..? Income..? Property..? Prove it..!
“ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat” ~ “The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies”. Dig. 22, 3, 2; Tait on Ev. 1; 1 Phil. Ev. 194; 1 Green l. Ev. 74; 3 Louis. R. 83; 2 Dan. Pr. 408; 4 Bouv Inst. n. 4411
“Thou shalt not bear false witness: thou shalt not speak falsely before the King, nor before the Judge, nor in the assembly of the Princes, nor in the presence of the Ruler, nor unto the Minister of the Law, nor among the multitude; nor in the ear of thy friend, nor to thy wife, nor thy child, nor thy servant: neither shalt thou withhold the truth from the King, nor the Judge, nor him that is set in authority: for thus shall righteousness be established in all thy borders.”
1 comment
B4L
Is this Clearfield Doctrine accepted in the UK Courts?
Log in to comment