This is wrong on so many levels I don't even know where to begin. If this is OK why not cloning? Why not cloning with any hereditary 'negative details removed, better yet.. added benefits?
If a clone is fine, what about mass cloning? the wholesale manufacture of workers? made to fit, and preprogrammed for your task?
What? No, not really people, I mean, if they have no actual parent, more so just a collection of cells mixed in a dish, oh those wonderful designer beasts of burden..
Well, who needs those random, hit and miss common folk with their rights, and their ideas, am i right..?
Malte Henryk
I find this absolutely obscene and disturbing. If our civilization meets this idea with brought acceptance it deserves no less than being wiped out.
Maybe I’m in the minority, but if this technology doesn’t harm another life, and creates a life for stable couple, then I think this is not a negative. A bit post-human in concept but why not? I’m open to being convinced though
Eugenics is already a thing for decades. Cloning of humans perfected and done since early 1960s. Jimmy Carter is a clone for ex, original was killed in 1977. Reagan was killed in 1981, he didnt survive that shot. Eugenics is good if not forced on anyone without their consent( parents in this case)
https://youtu.be/kDjy_K9--Ls
If a clone is fine, what about mass cloning? the wholesale manufacture of workers? made to fit, and preprogrammed for your task?
What? No, not really people, I mean, if they have no actual parent, more so just a collection of cells mixed in a dish, oh those wonderful designer beasts of burden..
Well, who needs those random, hit and miss common folk with their rights, and their ideas, am i right..?