Brittany Sellner
edited  

83 comments

Show 13 more comments
camzu
This is wrong on so many levels I don't even know where to begin. If this is OK why not cloning? Why not cloning with any hereditary 'negative details removed, better yet.. added benefits?

If a clone is fine, what about mass cloning? the wholesale manufacture of workers? made to fit, and preprogrammed for your task?

What? No, not really people, I mean, if they have no actual parent, more so just a collection of cells mixed in a dish, oh those wonderful designer beasts of burden..

Well, who needs those random, hit and miss common folk with their rights, and their ideas, am i right..?
Malte Henryk
I find this absolutely obscene and disturbing. If our civilization meets this idea with brought acceptance it deserves no less than being wiped out.
🇦🇹 Patrick Abdalla
Are these the End Times people keep telling me about?
Bernhard
Wow. So gay males will be biological parents. Right wing loses an argument ;)
Jon Doe (Pureblood)
Dimitri
I think this is pretty exciting It would allow same-sex couples to have children that are biologically theirs
You sound just as perverted and immoral as the "people" your defending.
1
Jon Doe (Pureblood)
Bernhard
Wow. So gay males will be biological parents. Right wing loses an argument ;)
Try it without a scientist you tard.
1
Dimitri
Jon Doe (Pureblood)
You sound just as perverted and immoral as the "people" your defending.
if you were gay do you think you would use this technology?
Jon Doe (Pureblood)
Dimitri
if you were gay do you think you would use this technology?
No, its perverted and unnatural, just like gay sex.
2
Dimitri
Jon Doe (Pureblood)
No, its perverted and unnatural, just like gay sex.
what are your thoughts on oral sex
Jon Doe (Pureblood)
Dimitri
what are your thoughts on oral sex
My thoughts on oral sex are...go fuck yourself and mind your own business.
Dimitri
Jon Doe (Pureblood)
My thoughts on oral sex are...go fuck yourself and mind your own business.
succc
Jon Sellen
Maybe I’m in the minority, but if this technology doesn’t harm another life, and creates a life for stable couple, then I think this is not a negative. A bit post-human in concept but why not? I’m open to being convinced though
Klaus Ebner
Who on earth would even consider going to such lengths of research when a perfectly natura... Oh wait. Never mind.... I should have known..
2
Anton Komel
Looks like humans are obsolete. They will do everything to stop us. We will not be able to live normal lives anymore.
1
Jessica & Pierre M.
WTF
Valeri
camzu
This is wrong on so many levels I don't even know where to begin. If this is OK why not cloning? Why not cloning with any hereditary 'negative details removed, better yet.. added benefits? If a clone is fine, what about mass cloning? the wholesale manufacture of workers? made to fit, and preprogrammed for your task? What? No, not really people, I mean, if they have no actual parent, more so just a collection of cells mixed in a dish, oh those wonderful designer beasts of burden.. Well, who needs those random, hit and miss common folk with their rights, and their ideas, am i right..?
Eugenics is already a thing for decades. Cloning of humans perfected and done since early 1960s. Jimmy Carter is a clone for ex, original was killed in 1977. Reagan was killed in 1981, he didnt survive that shot. Eugenics is good if not forced on anyone without their consent( parents in this case)
Valeri
Anton Komel
Looks like humans are obsolete. They will do everything to stop us. We will not be able to live normal lives anymore.
Define "normal". Are you a homo? Then your life isnt changed
Valeri
Klaus Ebner
Who on earth would even consider going to such lengths of research when a perfectly natura... Oh wait. Never mind.... I should have known..
Gays want gheir own flesh and blood kids too
Valeri
Jon Sellen
Maybe I’m in the minority, but if this technology doesn’t harm another life, and creates a life for stable couple, then I think this is not a negative. A bit post-human in concept but why not? I’m open to being convinced though
Gays are not stable couples in 99.999% of cases statistically. Also kids raised by gay couples are 12-14 times more likely to become fully gay too. Proven studies and statistics on this. Do your research
2
Jessica & Pierre M.
Jon Sellen
Maybe I’m in the minority, but if this technology doesn’t harm another life, and creates a life for stable couple, then I think this is not a negative. A bit post-human in concept but why not? I’m open to being convinced though
You are the trash of human existence
Jessica & Pierre M.
Valeri
Gays are not stable couples in 99.999% of cases statistically. Also kids raised by gay couples are 12-14 times more likely to become fully gay too. Proven studies and statistics on this. Do your research
Machines will take over the earth. It’s finished for us guys. We are already obsolete. Gays and machines
Show next 49 comments