Playing God doesn't end well. Figuring out a way around the natural order may be possible, but think about what they would be creating. A human with two fathers. Do scientists have the right to take away a child's earliest experiences with its mother? Every other human has that. It's theft or abuse never before possible.
I believe, if we are to be staunch supporters that creating life is the paramount achievement in life (which I do believe), then we must not necessarily automatically discredit the creation of more life. Even by unconventional means.
This will change how society will question if people were made natural or created in a lab. Dare I say, those created in the lab will be viewed as less human.
Having slept on it, i imagine they will still need an ovulating female for their process to work. Science may be able to start the cellular process, but they haven't developed a system that can replace a placenta.. Entering alien territory here!
While IVF programs, and surrogate mothers are 1 thing, it will be something altogether different carrying a product of science to term. I wonder, does the surrogate in this case even need to be human.. Just how far will boundaries be pushed in this dangerous frontier?
And I'd like to live forever...Children are not concomitant to homosexuality, let alone deviant degenerates who want to Larp as parents and twist science to satisfy their debasment of our species......
Lol. You are truly delusional and need psychiatric help if you ignore facts and data regarding automation which disproves your claims. Oh and a total of 3% are gay(lesbian included) and bisexual, combined. You have mo arguments,. Hence your opinion is moot and useless drivel. The news article literally shows women are obsolete, when it comes to the eggs in ovaries and womb. Both can now be achieved without a woman at all. Yet you say men are obsolete. Guess you see yourself as a woman,not a man. Also too many Terminator and Matrix movies for you😅. Tens of millions of men have bought A.I. sexbots though, some of them still live with wives too.
The IQ level of this reply is surprising. How did Brittany's channel attract people like you, you seem to lack the mental capacity to even comprehend her videos at this point,let alone have an argumented point. You did mot counter any of my arguments. You're dismissed. "I'm open to being convinced" -- you "You're an idiot" -- also you when read statistics on how damaging gay couples with kids are to the kids and thus society as a whole. You are not open to anything zealot.
Dude, countless kids have grown up and are very happy to have had the parents they did, the gay parents too. They have literally said so. And for decades now officially and legally, and centuries,millennias unofficially, gays have raised adopted kids( or where one parent is biological parent) You are jealous they can reach it? Is it because you fear the kid choosing to possibly become gay themselves when older? If so, why does it frighten you? You make a lot of assumptions about what God allows and wants. You have a god complex it seems.
If anything, God created these scientific breakthroughs and ability to do so. Otherwise you could not take a male cell and XY chromosome and create an egg from thevX part of the chromosome. That is God's divine programming of human genetics. Hence God's will be done! And you are ko mouthpiece for God. Even the pope, the holy leader of theCatholic Church told God's disciples that gays do not go to hell at all, that is not true. So you got less and less straws to grasp unto. A dying breed of zealots. Had you approached this from a statistical and neurological perspective, we could debate. But you seem to lack that capacity.
You make claims with no scientific proof. There is plenty proof that a child raised with 2 mothers( would you put up a stink if it was 2 women?) or 2 fathers will not suffer at all from lack of anything and will grow up to be just as capable and happy. This has been proven many millions of times. You project your own god complex unto others.
By your own logic,feminist, you should consider how over half of children currently( 59% of all mothers in USA ,who have a kid under age 16, are single mothers. This % is growing fast each year. 93% of all black mothers with kids under 16, are single mothers.) So does family court have right to take away a father's rights to have 50/50 custody? And yet, law since early 1960s onwards says by default only woman gets 100% custody. Only 9% of dads get joint custody, only when the mother allowed it. 91% of mothers did not allow it. So you femimist hypocrit should be ridiculed for your double standards. Mothers, by your own logic, cause waaaay more damage to kids by taking away fathers from kids forcefully.
Creating life is not the paramount achievement in life,dumbass. I could create tens of thousands of babies with many women, countless wonen throw their babies ina dumpster after birth or give away to orphanage or abort them . You are either an immoral sociopath/autistic it seems,by that logic, or incredibly limited in mental capacity to not grasp how stupid your statement is. Creating life is not any greatesy achievement, it's a damn biological process simply. However raising a kid properly..is where a majority of parents always fail. Raising a great independent thinker and well-adapted human who can give society and other humans usefulness,that is indeed a great achievement. Creating life in and of itself means very little,and can often be a bad decision even.( Mao's mom,Stalin's mom, Mussolini's mom, Zedung's ,Mugabe's moms could have aborted indeed)
No. Because we have had lab created babies for decades,dude. IVF and petri dish babies been born since 1977-78. They are celebrated actually in society as miracle babies at the time,and nowadays as a great story to tell others. Research. Nothing changes here, same organic matter from human cells is used as it always has. These are not synthetics.
You seem confused truly. This would still be a standard run of the mill male or female born. You seem to not grasp the news. How is this evil? You have no answer,zealot.
No. You failed to understand. An egg is created from a male XY chromosome foubd in the DNA, the skin cell then is used as an incubator of the egg created from said X part of the XY male chromosome. Women are not needed in any capacity at all for having children anymore . That is the breakthrough. Artificial wombs have been in development for many decades, as well. This is nothing new and it has been simply perfected now. Research.
Zero zealotry here, hun. You just sound like an idiot. Goddam I thought this wasn’t Twitter. Why did all the trolls come here from Twitter, I thought there would be intelligent discourse. I’ll be done after this comment, you can get your last dumb jab in if you want but it won’t be read.
You're reading a lot into my comment that isn't there. Detaching childbirth from the womb of the mother has a million negative implications with very few payoffs. I don't think giving gay men a chance to have a baby that looks like both of them is a good enough reason to twist nature like this. It's also a very superficial reason. It's likely being framed as a gay rights issue so that the researchers can smooth over the obvious abomination that is the artificial womb.
I have failed to understand nothing. I was not speaking conception, I was speaking gestation, cell recombination to created an embryo is 1 thing, the biological intricacies, finesse, and convolution, of a placenta, is far beyond the current science.
Let alone the implications of a LJ embryo reaching term, without inclusion of the vast number of hormonal, antibacterial, and immunological systems that are assumed during the process of gestation.
Again as I said, implant is critical to the process, my question is, will they push the frontier and use an ape, pig, cow.. or do you think they have maybe managed to create a synthetic egg?
If the idea wasn't so abhorrent to me, from a medical, let alone theological position, id be interested.. and more than a little bemused, to see them hatch a child. Alien has now morphed to Mork and Mindy.
While IVF programs, and surrogate mothers are 1 thing, it will be something altogether different carrying a product of science to term. I wonder, does the surrogate in this case even need to be human.. Just how far will boundaries be pushed in this dangerous frontier?
The news article literally shows women are obsolete, when it comes to the eggs in ovaries and womb. Both can now be achieved without a woman at all. Yet you say men are obsolete. Guess you see yourself as a woman,not a man. Also too many Terminator and Matrix movies for you😅. Tens of millions of men have bought A.I. sexbots though, some of them still live with wives too.
"I'm open to being convinced" -- you
"You're an idiot" -- also you when read statistics on how damaging gay couples with kids are to the kids and thus society as a whole.
You are not open to anything zealot.
If anything, God created these scientific breakthroughs and ability to do so. Otherwise you could not take a male cell and XY chromosome and create an egg from thevX part of the chromosome. That is God's divine programming of human genetics. Hence God's will be done! And you are ko mouthpiece for God. Even the pope, the holy leader of theCatholic Church told God's disciples that gays do not go to hell at all, that is not true. So you got less and less straws to grasp unto. A dying breed of zealots.
Had you approached this from a statistical and neurological perspective, we could debate. But you seem to lack that capacity.
So does family court have right to take away a father's rights to have 50/50 custody? And yet, law since early 1960s onwards says by default only woman gets 100% custody. Only 9% of dads get joint custody, only when the mother allowed it. 91% of mothers did not allow it. So you femimist hypocrit should be ridiculed for your double standards. Mothers, by your own logic, cause waaaay more damage to kids by taking away fathers from kids forcefully.
Let alone the implications of a LJ embryo reaching term, without inclusion of the vast number of hormonal, antibacterial, and immunological systems that are assumed during the process of gestation.
Again as I said, implant is critical to the process, my question is, will they push the frontier and use an ape, pig, cow.. or do you think they have maybe managed to create a synthetic egg?
If the idea wasn't so abhorrent to me, from a medical, let alone theological position, id be interested.. and more than a little bemused, to see them hatch a child. Alien has now morphed to Mork and Mindy.