That is clumsy and nees multiple steps and literally already didproven since there are nothing except typical flu and its typical mutation as always. There is no social score either, so you are making up scenarios that do not exist outside China. And secondly nobody is dying from any virus who wouldn't have died with 1 foot in the grave anyway when the flu affected them in any prior year. Death rates are unchanged.
1st off: i used the word "disease", not "virus". Viruses are a product of our immune system while detoxing. The stronger it gets, the stronger your immunity will become (litterally like "whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger"). And when i speak of the disease, i made clear that it's not deadly... you will sooner die from lightning that whatever the media build their fear porn around. But, do you need the science to not get the jab? I don't. All i need to know is that known liars who claim that the Earth is overpopulated want to inject me with mystery juice to save me from something that poses no threat.
Nope. I know plenty people who took 1st jab,but wisened up and refused to take 2nd jab. End of story. They have been healthy before and after the 1st jab. And mang who never took it. Also many who took both jabs, and now absolutely have said they refuse to take 3rd jab ever, waking up to the illogical bs. So your theory already collapsed.
Is it clumsy? China are running social credit score. Microsoft also have the passport prototype. It's not a big stretch, actually. Give them 2 or 3 years max.
So your theory is based on 2 factors: apotential future that does not exist yet and getting killed by some variant of something if you dont get next jab...yet people already refused to take 2nd or 3rd jab and never plan to,yet healthy without it for months now. It just doesn't make sense to me. Once I see any evidence of that, then I'll consider it as a plausible theory. The nanobots are a thing, and you can fully control person wether they want to do something or not. It's foolproof,don't even need to try anymore then or coercion used
They litterally designed the jab in 3 hrs, on a computer (their own words). And they just did some animal testing, just so the test subjects would die, as proof that they didn't skip this phase. At the end of the day, everyone gets their info from a hand rubber billionaire's outlet. So, all we can do is to speculate, from what we have. Speaking of which, what happens after a year of having the 1st dose, only? For all we know, it could already be too late. But, if we believe the creator of MRNA technology (on whose wiki it has been removed), it goes hand in hand with the theory i go by.
Say what you will, each is allowed their own perspective and myself and many others signed up under the idea that we were fighting for those perspectives.
People don't debate anymore, they just put down or laugh off other people's ideas without attempting to understand their take.
Bottom line..do not take the jab, or you'll end up in very bad shape ,physically or mentally or both or at least fully controlled whenever they choose to activate the nanobots or when someone gets out of line. Either way, I think low IQ people or those who do it begrudgingly for sake of their small kids(to feed them, need to have a job etc) , are only ones that take the vaxx.
Robert Malone was the creator. The fact that he achieved it disappeared from his wiki. And, he said (i said it, while only quoting him)"it will make your immune system addicted to the jab, in order to function. And you said it right, regarding what those shots are: gene therapy. We made different conclusions, but we agree that those shots are bad.
So why aren't those who took 1 jab and refused a 2nd, for 8 months in some cases now, still have no desire to ever get 2nd one and are fully healthy still? So it will activate the addiction years later? And those who took 2 jabs in some cases since february already, especially in Israel etc,refusing and don't want 3rd one ever and are healthy too.
Again, we got little data. And, since the jab was created 6 or 8 months ago (according to their own words), how do we have any data, regarding "a year later"?
And what is the point of creatibg this addiction if they can just get another jab. That's the carrot. What is the stick? What's even the point of it. They can still want to get rid of the globalist elites even with those jabs in them, for many other rrasons why they hate the globalists.
And when i speak of the disease, i made clear that it's not deadly... you will sooner die from lightning that whatever the media build their fear porn around.
But, do you need the science to not get the jab? I don't.
All i need to know is that known liars who claim that the Earth is overpopulated want to inject me with mystery juice to save me from something that poses no threat.
It's not a big stretch, actually. Give them 2 or 3 years max.
At the end of the day, everyone gets their info from a hand rubber billionaire's outlet. So, all we can do is to speculate, from what we have. Speaking of which, what happens after a year of having the 1st dose, only? For all we know, it could already be too late. But, if we believe the creator of MRNA technology (on whose wiki it has been removed), it goes hand in hand with the theory i go by.
People don't debate anymore, they just put down or laugh off other people's ideas without attempting to understand their take.
And you said it right, regarding what those shots are: gene therapy.
We made different conclusions, but we agree that those shots are bad.