Literally it was proven in court yet again that covid-19 does not exist. You are embarrassing,you have no clue how virology works. Flu has different strains all the time. So you got a stronger strain that happens every other year,woopty doi. Stop talking about things you are uneducated about clearly and have no clue what you speak of. It was already confirmed in court and by medical and government authorities that indeed no proof of a covid-19 exists. Not in 2 years,not in any lab or nation. Yet 2500+ ''covid positive"test weretaken from CDC to test in university labs, allshowed it was influenza A and B,aka the flu. Science, baby.Research. viruses are always isolated within aday or 2 , yet nothing here. First time in history.

What about medical record tied to your social credit score? The next dose keeps you alive, but you need a certain score to get it. 1st dose turns your immune system in a junkie state, depending on the jab to function. Then, your score is too low, die from the next "variant" (which your surrounding will produce, endlessly).

That is clumsy and nees multiple steps and literally already didproven since there are nothing except typical flu and its typical mutation as always. There is no social score either, so you are making up scenarios that do not exist outside China. And secondly nobody is dying from any virus who wouldn't have died with 1 foot in the grave anyway when the flu affected them in any prior year. Death rates are unchanged.

1st off: i used the word "disease", not "virus". Viruses are a product of our immune system while detoxing. The stronger it gets, the stronger your immunity will become (litterally like "whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger"). And when i speak of the disease, i made clear that it's not deadly... you will sooner die from lightning that whatever the media build their fear porn around. But, do you need the science to not get the jab? I don't. All i need to know is that known liars who claim that the Earth is overpopulated want to inject me with mystery juice to save me from something that poses no threat.

Is it clumsy? China are running social credit score. Microsoft also have the passport prototype. It's not a big stretch, actually. Give them 2 or 3 years max.

So your theory is based on 2 factors: apotential future that does not exist yet and getting killed by some variant of something if you dont get next jab...yet people already refused to take 2nd or 3rd jab and never plan to,yet healthy without it for months now. It just doesn't make sense to me. Once I see any evidence of that, then I'll consider it as a plausible theory. The nanobots are a thing, and you can fully control person wether they want to do something or not. It's foolproof,don't even need to try anymore then or coercion used

"disgruntled", lol. Excuses . No revolution will come. Australia already has army beatingdown and keeping all people in their homes,quarantine. Police too, in mass.

Lol. AIDS is literally an artificial lab created disease, well known. Curca 40 years ago. To compare it to flu and its countless variants each year,same as hundreds of other viruses we have in our bodies always, is asinine

Say what you will, each is allowed their own perspective and myself and many others signed up under the idea that we were fighting for those perspectives. People don't debate anymore, they just put down or laugh off other people's ideas without attempting to understand their take.

I've never heard that chemtrail level of conspiracy theory before about Aids

They litterally designed the jab in 3 hrs, on a computer (their own words). And they just did some animal testing, just so the test subjects would die, as proof that they didn't skip this phase. At the end of the day, everyone gets their info from a hand rubber billionaire's outlet. So, all we can do is to speculate, from what we have. Speaking of which, what happens after a year of having the 1st dose, only? For all we know, it could already be too late. But, if we believe the creator of MRNA technology (on whose wiki it has been removed), it goes hand in hand with the theory i go by.

They litterally designed the jab in 3 hrs, on a computer (their own words). And they just did some animal testing, just so the test subjects would die, as proof that they didn't skip this phase. At the end of the day, everyone gets their info from a hand rubber billionaire's outlet. So, all we can do is to speculate, from what we have. Speaking of which, what happens after a year of having the 1st dose, only? For all we know, it could already be too late. But, if we believe the creator of MRNA technology (on whose wiki it has been removed), it goes hand in hand with the theory i go by.

Say what you will, each is allowed their own perspective and myself and many others signed up under the idea that we were fighting for those perspectives. People don't debate anymore, they just put down or laugh off other people's ideas without attempting to understand their take.

So what did that creator, (what is his name?) state about these "gene therapy"( as WHO calls them officialy) injections?

Robert Malone was the creator. The fact that he achieved it disappeared from his wiki. And, he said (i said it, while only quoting him)"it will make your immune system addicted to the jab, in order to function. And you said it right, regarding what those shots are: gene therapy. We made different conclusions, but we agree that those shots are bad.

So why aren't those who took 1 jab and refused a 2nd, for 8 months in some cases now, still have no desire to ever get 2nd one and are fully healthy still? So it will activate the addiction years later? And those who took 2 jabs in some cases since february already, especially in Israel etc,refusing and don't want 3rd one ever and are healthy too.

Robert Malone was the creator. The fact that he achieved it disappeared from his wiki. And, he said (i said it, while only quoting him)"it will make your immune system addicted to the jab, in order to function. And you said it right, regarding what those shots are: gene therapy. We made different conclusions, but we agree that those shots are bad.

Again, we got little data. And, since the jab was created 6 or 8 months ago (according to their own words), how do we have any data, regarding "a year later"?

And what is the point of creatibg this addiction if they can just get another jab. That's the carrot. What is the stick? What's even the point of it. They can still want to get rid of the globalist elites even with those jabs in them, for many other rrasons why they hate the globalists.

Again, we got little data. And, since the jab was created 6 or 8 months ago (according to their own words), how do we have any data, regarding "a year later"?